2020 Hunter Satisfaction Project Report

Executive Summary

• Only deer hunters were most likely to respond that deer hunting was their most important hunting activity. All other hunters were most likely to respond that their respective hunting active was one of several important hunting activities.
• Most hunters across all hunting activities responded that they participated in deer hunting every year.
• Hunters across all activities were most likely to either have never hunted waterfowl or hunt waterfowl every year.
• Most hunters across all hunting activities hunt upland game every year, except for deer hunters. Deer hunters were less likely to hunt upland game every year than all other hunter samples.
• Only Spring and Fall turkey hunters were likely to hunt turkeys every year.
• Overall, Spring and Fall turkey hunters have hunted turkeys for a fewer number of years than hunters of other activity types have hunted their respective game species.
• Hunters across all activity types were likely to be at least somewhat satisfied with their hunting season. Waterfowl hunters were notable more likely to be somewhat satisfied than very satisfied. Upland-game hunters were the most evenly distributed across all levels of satisfaction.
• The implicit importance of seeing deer and harvesting deer was greater than expected for hunters compared to explicit responses to attribute importance.
• The implicit importance of having opportunities to harvest waterfowl and calling in waterfowl was greater than expected for waterfowl hunters compared to explicit responses to attribute importance.
• The implicit importance of seeing game birds, having opportunities to shoot game birds, and harvesting the daily bag limit of game birds was greater than expected for upland-game hunters compared to explicit responses to attribute importance.
• The implicit importance of seeing turkeys, having opportunities to harvest, and harvesting a tom were greater than expected for Spring turkey hunters compared to explicit responses to attribute importance.
• The implicit importance of seeing turkeys, harvesting a tom, and harvesting a jake were greater than expected for Fall turkey hunters compared to explicit responses to attribute importance. Implicit importance of having turkeys come into decoys was less than expected.
• Attributes important to deer hunter satisfaction included seeing deer (basic), harvesting deer (basic), and harvesting a trophy deer (performance).
• The only important attribute to waterfowl hunter satisfaction was having opportunities to shoot waterfowl (performance).
• Important attributes for upland-game hunter satisfaction included seeing game birds (basic) and harvesting the daily bag limit of game birds (basic).
• Important attributes to Spring turkey hunter satisfaction included seeing turkeys (basic), opportunities to shoot turkeys (basic), harvesting a tom (performance), and hearing gobbling (performance).
• Attributes important to Fall turkey hunter satisfaction included seeing turkeys (performance) and harvesting a tom (basic).
• Most hunters do most of their hunting on private land. Notably, upland-game hunting is more likely to occur on public land than other hunting activities.
• Most haunters have zero children under the age of 16 residing in their household.
• Most hunters have never participated in a Nebraska Youth Pheasant Hunt, but those that have were most likely to have participated as a mentor.

General Information

This report describes responses to questions from the “2020 Hunter Satisfaction” survey. The “2020 Hunter Satisfaction” survey was a tool to analyze Nebraska hunters’ perspectives on the attributes that are important to their hunting season, how hunters feel these attributes performed when afield, and how importance and performance of attributes affect their overall satisfaction. We provide information regarding the design and implementation of the survey as well as summarized responses to questions relating to demographics, participation in various hunting activities, questions pertaining to importance and performance of hunt-specific attributes, and overall satisfaction with hunting experiences. We also include statistical tests to assess differences in the between residents and non-residents, hunters who reside in a rural or urban area, and hunters who grew up in a rural or urban area. General summaries of responses, Importance grid analyses (IGA) and Penalty-Reward-Contrast analyses (PRCA) are depicted for hunters who engaged in the following hunting activities: deer, waterfowl, upland game, Spring turkey, and Fall turkey.

Nebraska Hunter Satisfaction Project Objectives

1. Gather information about current Nebraska hunters and better understand hunting behavior
2. Measure the importance and performance of hunt-specific attributes and satisfaction with hunting experiences
3. Assess longitudinal changes in importance of hunt-specific attributes

Mode Selection

The stakeholders involved had several meetings to design the survey instrument that would properly meet the objectives. A web survey was used to determine the views of Nebraska hunters. Using this vehicle to collect information allows researchers to generalize results to a larger population. Email invitations were sent to a sample of hunters who purchased a hunting license, turkey permit, deer permit, Nebraska waterfowl stamp, or any combination in the 2019-2020 hunting year. Invitations were distributed on July 6, 2020. Reminder emails were sent to non-respondents on July 13 and 15, 2020. A final reminder was sent on the final day of the survey period, July 21, 2020.

Design and Item Selection

The design and fielding of the survey was accomplished by the Human Dimensions Lab in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln School of Natural Resources and the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. A separate questionnaire was distributed for each type of hunting activity. Each questionnaire consisted of items pertaining to attributes affiliated with the respective type of hunting activity. For the small game questionnaire, hunters were specifically asked whether they participated in upland-game hunting (pheasant, quail, and grouse). Questionnaires included attributes that addressed the importance and actualization of experiences related to the respective type of hunting activity. All hunting activities included the following attributes: seeing the respective game type, opportunities to shoot the respective game type, harvesting the respective game type, hunting in favorable weather conditions, not seeing other hunters, no interference from other hunters, access to private land, access to public land, and hunting with other people.

Additional activity-specific attributes were included for each type of hunting experience based on existing literature on deer (Hautaluoma and Brown 1978, Hammitt et al. 1990, Gigliotti 2000, Manfredo et al. 2004, Kerr 2017, Pang 2017), waterfowl (Vaske et al. 1986, Brunke and Hunt 2007), upland-game (Hayslette et al. 2001, Frey et al. 2003), and turkey (Hazel et al. 1990, Wynveen et al. 2005, Schroeder et al. 2018) hunters. Attribute importance was measured on a five-point scale of 1 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important). Respondents were also asked to rate how well each experienced attribute met expectations, ranging from 1 (far below expectations) to 5 (far exceeded expectations). Overall satisfaction with their hunting experience was also measured on a 5-point scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).

Analyses

Assessing effects of importance and performance on satisfaction involves two types of analyses. Importance Grid Analysis compares explicit rating to implicit importance ratings derived by multiple regression of overall satisfaction on attribute performance ratings (Matzler and Sauerwein 2002, Matzler et al. 2003). Originally employed by Vavra (1997), IGA was used to describe attributes as either excitement, performance, or basic typologies. However, the value of IGA for classifying attributes has since been discounted, and IGA is currently recognized for the ability to distinguish between explicit and implicit importance of attributes (Smith and Deppa 2009, Mikulić and Prebežac 2011). Explicit importance reflects a rational assessment of how one expects an attribute to affect satisfaction, while implicit importance reflects the experiential-based impact of an attribute on satisfaction. IGA delineates differences between hunters’ “expectations of an attributes’ relevancy to a desired end” (i.e., explicit importance) compared to “experiential information gained from one’s real-time encounter” (i.e., implicit importance) (Smith and Deppa 2009, Schroeder et al. 2018).

Explicit importance is calculated by taking the mean rating of each attribute importance as measured from the questionnaire. Implicit importance is derived from multiple linear regression coefficients (performance values of each attribute as the independent variables and overall satisfaction as the dependent variable). Explicit means and implicit coefficients are then plotted, and attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction.

Penalty-Reward-Contrast Analysis is described as the three-factor theory in that it identifies the following three factors to customer satisfaction: basic factors, performance factors, and excitement factors (Deng 2007, Deng et al. 2008, Kim et al. 2014). Basic factors will induce dissatisfaction if expectations with a given attribute are not met, but will not increase satisfaction if expectations are met or exceeded. Basic factors can be viewed as the minimum requirements for a product or experience. Performance factors will increase satisfaction if expectations are fulfilled or exceeded and dissatisfaction if expectations are not fulfilled. Excitement factors will increase satisfaction if delivered but do not cause dissatisfaction if they are missing. For example, the three-factory theory can be applied in the airline service industry. Safety can be viewed as a basic factor insofar as passengers expect to be safe during the flight. If safety expectations are met, then safety attributes will not induce customer dissatisfaction; nor will customers become more satisfied with their experience based on safety attributes alone. However, if passengers feel unsafe, lack of safety will induce dissatisfaction. Expediency in retrieving baggage after the flight might be viewed as a performance factor. If passengers must wait longer than expected to retrieve their baggage, they will become dissatisfied, but if they can claim their baggage more quickly than expected, passengers will be more satisfied with their experience. Quality or price of snacks and beverages during the flight may be viewed as an excitement factor. If the quality of snacks is excellent, passengers will be more satisfied, but lack of quality will not induce dissatisfaction.

Conducting the PRCA incorporates a 3-step process, which examines influence on overall satisfaction at high and low-performance levels. In step 1, a simple linear regression is performed, and significant factors (performance ratings; 1 to 5) are recoded into Penalty and Reward dummy variables. If a respondent answered that, the performance of an attribute was a “1,” their Penalty value would be a “1” and their Reward value would be a “0.” A rating of a “5” for a performance attribute would result in a Penalty value of “0” and a Reward value of “1.” A performance of rating of “2,” “3,” or “4” would result in a “0” for both Penalty and Reward values. Step 2 consists of a multiple regression with the dummy variables used, independent variables and overall satisfaction with the hunting experience as the dependent variable. The third step is classification of attributes (basic, performance, excitement, or unimportant). An attribute is considered basic if the Penalty variable is significant and the reward variable is not significant, performance if both Penalty and Reward variables are significant, and excitement if the only the Reward variable is significant. Attribute is considered unimportant if neither Penalty nor Reward variables are significant.

Survey population

Questionnaires were sent to 3,007 deer hunters, 3,854 waterfowl hunters, 2,794 upland-game hunters, 2,769 Spring turkey hunters, and 2,712 Fall turkey hunters. A total of approximately 15136 questionnaires were distributed. Adjusted response rates for the individual survey questionnaires was 26%, 14%, 17%, 23%, and 20%, respectively. The overall adjusted response rate to the survey project was 20%.

Deer Hunter Survey Responses Per Day

There were 3007 invited to participate in the deer hunter survey; 211 were invalid email addresses, and 716 completed the survey (a response rate of 25.6%). Time to take the survey ranged from 1.9 to 61.3 mins, with a mean of 10.4 mins.

The average age of the deer hunter population was 46.18 and the average age of the sample was 47.73 (t = -5.5, df = 3256.61, p = 0). In the deer hunter population; 9% of hunters were female, and 7% of the hunters in the sample were female (\(\chi^2\) = 9.45, df = 1, p = 0). The mean age of hunters who responded to the survey was 52.28 (SD = 14.19) and mean age of hunters who did not respond to the survey was 46.3 (SD = 15.06). The proportion of female hunters in the group who responded to the survey was 4.47% and the proportion of female hunters in the non-respondent group was 8.25%

Relative non-response bias is the proportion of the population characteristic of interest that the bias represents (Callegaro et al. 2015). Relative non-response bias is calculated as the difference in mean of the value of interest from respondents and from non-respondents. The difference is multiplied by the proportion of non-respondents relative to respondents and then the value of interest is divided by the mean of the entire sample population. The relative non-response bias for age was 9.53% and the relative non-response bias for gender was 39.19%.

Percentage of responses per day for the deer hunter survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses submitted on each date.

Waterfowl Hunter Survey Responses Per Day

There were 3854 invited to participate in the waterfowl survey; 250 were invalid email addresses and 506 completed the survey (a response rate of 14%). Time to take the survey ranged from 1.6 to 100.4 mins, with a mean of 9.6 mins.

The average age of the waterfowl hunter population was 43.42 and the average age of the sample was 44.11 (t = -2.75, df = 5398.76, p = 0.01). In the waterfowl hunter population 4% of hunters were female, and 4% of the hunters in the sample were female (\(\chi^2\) = 4.3, df = 1, p = 0.04). The mean age of hunters who responded to the survey was 48.8 (SD = 14.08) and mean age of hunters who did not respond to the survey was 43.4 (SD = 14.27). The proportion of female hunters in the group that responded to the survey was 2.37% and the proportion of female hunters in the non-respondent group was 3.88%

Relative non-response bias is the proportion of the population characteristic of interest that the bias represents (Callegaro et al. 2015). Relative non-response bias is calculated as the difference in mean of the value of interest from respondents and from non-respondents. The difference is multiplied by the proportion of non-respondents relative to respondents and then the value of interest is divided by the mean of the entire sample population. The relative non-response bias for age was 10.63% and the relative non-response bias for gender was 35.63%.

Percentage of responses per day for the waterfowl hunter survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses submitted on each date.

Upland Game Hunter Survey Responses Per Day

There were 2794 invited to participate in the upland game survey 250 were invalid email addresses, and 426 completed the survey (a response rate of 16.7%). Time to take the survey ranged from 1 to 1310.5 mins, with a mean of 12.2 mins.

The average age of the upland game hunter population was 54.83 and the average age of the sample was 53.7 (t = 3.34, df = 2999.38, p = 0). In the upland game hunter population 10% of hunters were female and 6% of the hunters in the sample were female (\(\chi^2\) = 48.98, df = 1, p = 0). The mean age of hunters who responded to the survey was 55.38 (SD = 15.28) and mean age of hunters who did not respond to the survey was 53.4 (SD = 18.04). The proportion of female hunters in the group who responded to the survey was 3.29%, and the proportion of female hunters in the non-respondent group was 6.38%

Relative non-response bias is the proportion of the population characteristic of interest that the bias represents (Callegaro et al. 2015). Relative non-response bias is calculated as the difference in mean of the value of interest from respondents and from non-respondents. The difference is multiplied by the proportion of non-respondents relative to respondents and then the value of interest is divided by the mean of the entire sample population. The relative non-response bias for age was 3.13% and the relative non-response bias for gender was 44.35%, as there were 0 females who completed the survey.

Percentage of responses per day for the upland game hunter survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses submitted on each date.

Spring Turkey Hunter Survey Responses Per Day

There were 2769 invited to participate in the survey; 173 were invalid email addresses and 596 completed the survey (a response rate of 23%). Time to take the survey ranged from 1.6 to 212.1 mins, with a mean of 11.1 mins.

The average age of the spring turkey hunter population was 44.1 and the average age of the sample was 44.58 (t = -1.49, df = 4037.02, p = 0.14). In the spring turkey hunter population, 7% of hunters were female and 6% of the hunters in the sample were female (\(\chi^2\) = 5.89, df = 1, p = 0.02). The mean age of hunters who responded to the survey was 48.72 (SD = 15.42) and mean age of hunters who did not respond to the survey was 43.44 (SD = 15.25). The proportion of female hunters in the group who responded to the survey was 4.7%, and the proportion of female hunters in the non-respondent group was 6.4%

Relative non-response bias is the proportion of the population characteristic of interest that the bias represents (Callegaro et al. 2015). Relative non-response bias is calculated as the difference in mean of the value of interest from respondents and from non-respondents. The difference is multiplied by the proportion of non-respondents relative to respondents and then the value of interest is divided by the mean of the entire sample population. The relative non-response bias for age was 9.29% and the relative non-response bias for gender was 22.1%.

Percentage of responses per day for the spring turkey hunter survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses submitted on each date.

Fall Turkey Hunter Survey Responses Per Day

There were 2712 invited to participate in the fall turkey survey; 189 were invalid email addresses, and 513 completed the survey (a response rate of 20.3%). Time to take the survey ranged from 1.6 to 126.2 mins, with a mean of 9.9 mins.

The average age of the fall turkey hunter population was 51.22 and the average age of the sample was 51.02 (t = 0.5, df = 5938.45, p = 0.61). In the fall turkey hunter population, 5% of hunters were female and 4% of the hunters in the sample were female (\(\chi^2\) = 2.6, df = 1, p = 0.11). The mean age of hunters who responded to the survey was 55.08 (SD = 14.61) and mean age of hunters who did not respond to the survey was 50.07 (SD = 16.05). The proportion of female hunters in the group who responded to the survey was 3.12%, and the proportion of female hunters in the non-respondent group was 4.37%

Relative non-response bias is the proportion of the population characteristic of interest that the bias represents (Callegaro et al. 2015). Relative non-response bias is calculated as the difference in mean of the value of interest from respondents and from non-respondents. The difference is multiplied by the proportion of non-respondents relative to respondents and then the value of interest is divided by the mean of the entire sample population. The relative non-response bias for age was 7.96% and the relative non-response bias for gender was 24.48%.

Percentage of responses per day for the spring fall hunter survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses submitted on each date.

Survey Section 1: Self-Identity

Hunting Importance

How important is XXXX hunting to you compared to other types of hunting?

Percentage of hunting type importance responses for each satisfaction survey. Bars represent the stated importance of hunting the game type of the respective survey respondents (i.e. How important deer hunting is to the deer hunter sample). Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Hunting Importance

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Deer hunting is my most important hunting activity	85	52.1	295	53.8	380	53.4
Deer hunting is one of several important hunting activities to me	76	46.6	245	44.7	321	45.1
Deer hunting is less important to me than some of my other hunting activities	2	1.2	6	1.1	8	1.1
Deer hunting is one of my least important hunting activities	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Waterfowl Hunting Importance

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Waterfowl hunting is my most important hunting activity	1	14.3	121	24.2	122	24.1
Waterfowl hunting is one of several important hunting activities to me	5	71.4	276	55.3	281	55.5
Waterfowl hunting is less important to me than some of my other hunting activities	1	14.3	69	13.8	70	13.8
Waterfowl hunting is one of my least important hunting activities	0	0.0	30	6.0	30	5.9
No Response	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.6
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Upland Game Hunting Importance

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Upland Game hunting is my most important hunting activity	52	39.4	66	22.6	118	27.8
Upland Game hunting is one of several important hunting activities to me	58	43.9	157	53.8	215	50.7
Upland Game hunting is less important to me than some of my other hunting activities	15	11.4	49	16.8	64	15.1
Upland Game hunting is one of my least important hunting activities	6	4.5	20	6.8	26	6.1
No Response	1	0.8	0	0.0	1	0.2
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Spring Turkey Hunting Importance

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Turkey hunting is my most important hunting activity	12	18.2	42	8.0	54	9.1
Turkey hunting is one of several important hunting activities to me	49	74.2	407	77.1	456	76.8
Turkey hunting is less important to me than some of my other hunting activities	4	6.1	70	13.3	74	12.5
Turkey hunting is one of my least important hunting activities	1	1.5	9	1.7	10	1.7
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Fall Turkey Hunting Importance

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Turkey hunting is my most important hunting activity	20	18.7	20	4.9	40	7.8
Turkey hunting is one of several important hunting activities to me	70	65.4	271	66.9	341	66.6
Turkey hunting is less important to me than some of my other hunting activities	15	14.0	92	22.7	107	20.9
Turkey hunting is one of my least important hunting activities	2	1.9	20	4.9	22	4.3
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.5	2	0.4
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

When Hunting

Which type of hunter best describes you?

Percentage of hunt frequency responses for each satisfaction survey. Bars represent when survey respondents hunted their respective game type (i.e. When deer hunters hunted for deer). Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

When Deer Hunters are Hunting

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Hunt opening weekend only	6	3.7	19	3.5	25	3.5
Hunt opening weekend & the first couple of weekends thereafter (no more than 5 days hunting total in the season)	15	9.2	81	14.8	96	13.5
Hunt occasionally throughout the season	28	17.2	121	22.1	149	21.0
Hunt as many days as I can throughout the entire season	114	69.9	326	59.5	440	61.9
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.1
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

When Waterfowl Hunters are Hunting

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Hunt opening weekend only	0	0.0	6	1.2	6	1.2
Hunt opening weekend & the first couple of weekends thereafter (no more than 5 days hunting total in the season)	0	0.0	18	3.6	18	3.6
Hunt occasionally throughout the season	4	57.1	250	50.1	254	50.2
Hunt as many days as I can throughout the entire season	3	42.9	223	44.7	226	44.7
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.4
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

When Upland Game Hunters are Hunting

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Hunt opening weekend only	4	3.0	7	2.4	11	2.6
Hunt opening weekend & the first couple of weekends thereafter (no more than 5 days hunting total in the season)	5	3.8	21	7.2	26	6.1
Hunt occasionally throughout the season	54	40.9	159	54.5	213	50.2
Hunt as many days as I can throughout the entire season	68	51.5	104	35.6	172	40.6
No Response	1	0.8	1	0.3	2	0.5
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

When Spring Turkey Hunters are Hunting

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Hunt opening weekend only	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.5
Hunt opening weekend & the first couple of weekends thereafter (no more than 5 days hunting total in the season)	5	7.6	44	8.3	49	8.2
Hunt occasionally throughout the season	11	16.7	251	47.5	262	44.1
Hunt as many days as I can throughout the entire season	50	75.8	229	43.4	279	47.0
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

When Fall Turkey Hunters are Hunting

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Hunt opening weekend only	8	7.5	4	1.0	12	2.3
Hunt opening weekend & the first couple of weekends thereafter (no more than 5 days hunting total in the season)	12	11.2	22	5.4	34	6.6
Hunt occasionally throughout the season	35	32.7	235	58.0	270	52.7
Hunt as many days as I can throughout the entire season	51	47.7	142	35.1	193	37.7
No Response	1	0.9	2	0.5	3	0.6
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Where Hunting

Which best describes how you hunt?

Percentage of hunting location responses for each satisfaction survey. Bars represent where survey respondents hunted their respective game type (i.e. Where deer hunters hunted for deer). Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Where Deer Hunters Hunt

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
I hunt the same areas every year, and rarely hunt new areas	56	34.4	331	60.4	387	54.4
I tend to hunt the same areas each year, but often make trips to new areas to hunt	77	47.2	165	30.1	242	34.0
I hunt familiar areas and new areas with equal frequency	21	12.9	28	5.1	49	6.9
I don’t have favorite hunting areas, but hunt wherever the opportunity arises	9	5.5	24	4.4	33	4.6
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Where Waterfowl Hunters Hunt

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
I hunt the same areas every year, and rarely hunt new areas	3	42.9	187	37.5	190	37.5
I tend to hunt the same areas each year, but often make trips to new areas to hunt	2	28.6	188	37.7	190	37.5
I hunt familiar areas and new areas with equal frequency	1	14.3	42	8.4	43	8.5
I don’t have favorite hunting areas, but hunt wherever the opportunity arises	1	14.3	80	16.0	81	16.0
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.4
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Where Upland Game Hunters Hunt

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
I hunt the same areas every year, and rarely hunt new areas	25	18.9	116	39.7	141	33.3
I tend to hunt the same areas each year, but often make trips to new areas to hunt	77	58.3	101	34.6	178	42.0
I hunt familiar areas and new areas with equal frequency	19	14.4	37	12.7	56	13.2
I don’t have favorite hunting areas, but hunt wherever the opportunity arises	11	8.3	38	13.0	49	11.6
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Where Spring Turkey Hunters Hunt

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
I hunt the same areas every year, and rarely hunt new areas	19	28.8	201	38.1	220	37.0
I tend to hunt the same areas each year, but often make trips to new areas to hunt	29	43.9	215	40.7	244	41.1
I hunt familiar areas and new areas with equal frequency	15	22.7	63	11.9	78	13.1
I don’t have favorite hunting areas, but hunt wherever the opportunity arises	3	4.5	49	9.3	52	8.8
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Where Fall Turkey Hunters Hunt

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
I hunt the same areas every year, and rarely hunt new areas	44	41.1	167	41.2	211	41.2
I tend to hunt the same areas each year, but often make trips to new areas to hunt	38	35.5	133	32.8	171	33.4
I hunt familiar areas and new areas with equal frequency	16	15.0	54	13.3	70	13.7
I don’t have favorite hunting areas, but hunt wherever the opportunity arises	9	8.4	49	12.1	58	11.3
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.5	2	0.4
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Survey Section 2: Frequency of Hunting Type

Frequency of Participation

How often do you participate in each of the following hunting activities within the state of Nebraska?

Deer (e.g. White-tailed, Mule)

Percentage of deer participation status responses for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Participation by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	148	90.8	530	96.7	678	95.4
Participate but not every year	14	8.6	9	1.6	23	3.2
No longer participate	1	0.6	1	0.2	2	0.3
Never	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
No Response	0	0.0	6	1.1	6	0.8
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Deer Participation by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	6	85.7	328	65.7	334	66.0
Participate but not every year	0	0.0	63	12.6	63	12.5
No longer participate	0	0.0	40	8.0	40	7.9
Never	1	14.3	57	11.4	58	11.5
No Response	0	0.0	11	2.2	11	2.2
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Deer Participation by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	37	28.0	188	64.4	225	53.1
Participate but not every year	10	7.6	32	11.0	42	9.9
No longer participate	14	10.6	30	10.3	44	10.4
Never	57	43.2	37	12.7	94	22.2
No Response	14	10.6	5	1.7	19	4.5
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Deer Participation by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	31	47.0	431	81.6	462	77.8
Participate but not every year	5	7.6	35	6.6	40	6.7
No longer participate	5	7.6	17	3.2	22	3.7
Never	20	30.3	40	7.6	60	10.1
No Response	5	7.6	5	0.9	10	1.7
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Deer Participation by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	57	53.3	336	83.0	393	76.8
Participate but not every year	12	11.2	23	5.7	35	6.8
No longer participate	5	4.7	13	3.2	18	3.5
Never	29	27.1	27	6.7	56	10.9
No Response	4	3.7	6	1.5	10	2.0
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Waterfowl (e.g. Duck, Geese)

Percentage of waterfowl participation status responses for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Waterfowl Participation by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	22	13.5	116	21.2	138	19.4
Participate but not every year	15	9.2	76	13.9	91	12.8
No longer participate	23	14.1	121	22.1	144	20.3
Never	84	51.5	205	37.4	289	40.6
No Response	19	11.7	30	5.5	49	6.9
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Waterfowl Participation by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	7	100	436	87.4	443	87.5
Participate but not every year	0	0	48	9.6	48	9.5
No longer participate	0	0	6	1.2	6	1.2
Never	0	0	6	1.2	6	1.2
No Response	0	0	3	0.6	3	0.6
Total	7	100	499	100.0	506	100.0

Waterfowl Participation by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	51	38.6	82	28.1	133	31.4
Participate but not every year	24	18.2	52	17.8	76	17.9
No longer participate	7	5.3	47	16.1	54	12.7
Never	37	28.0	95	32.5	132	31.1
No Response	13	9.8	16	5.5	29	6.8
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Waterfowl Participation by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	18	27.3	220	41.7	238	40.1
Participate but not every year	7	10.6	69	13.1	76	12.8
No longer participate	4	6.1	76	14.4	80	13.5
Never	32	48.5	139	26.3	171	28.8
No Response	5	7.6	24	4.5	29	4.9
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Waterfowl Participation by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	26	24.3	164	40.5	190	37.1
Participate but not every year	14	13.1	66	16.3	80	15.6
No longer participate	12	11.2	57	14.1	69	13.5
Never	50	46.7	101	24.9	151	29.5
No Response	5	4.7	17	4.2	22	4.3
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Upland Game (e.g. Pheasant, Quail, Grouse, Dove)

Percentage of upland-game participation status responses for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Upland Game Participation by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	42	25.8	222	40.5	264	37.1
Participate but not every year	20	12.3	113	20.6	133	18.7
No longer participate	18	11.0	123	22.4	141	19.8
Never	71	43.6	71	13.0	142	20.0
No Response	12	7.4	19	3.5	31	4.4
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Upland Game Participation by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	6	85.7	367	73.5	373	73.7
Participate but not every year	0	0.0	86	17.2	86	17.0
No longer participate	0	0.0	21	4.2	21	4.2
Never	0	0.0	20	4.0	20	4.0
No Response	1	14.3	5	1.0	6	1.2
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Upland Game Participation by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	98	74.2	209	71.6	307	72.4
Participate but not every year	16	12.1	37	12.7	53	12.5
No longer participate	3	2.3	23	7.9	26	6.1
Never	11	8.3	17	5.8	28	6.6
No Response	4	3.0	6	2.1	10	2.4
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Upland Game Participation by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	22	33.3	329	62.3	351	59.1
Participate but not every year	7	10.6	81	15.3	88	14.8
No longer participate	7	10.6	53	10.0	60	10.1
Never	26	39.4	53	10.0	79	13.3
No Response	4	6.1	12	2.3	16	2.7
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Upland Game Participation by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	42	39.3	279	68.9	321	62.7
Participate but not every year	16	15.0	53	13.1	69	13.5
No longer participate	6	5.6	36	8.9	42	8.2
Never	35	32.7	26	6.4	61	11.9
No Response	8	7.5	11	2.7	19	3.7
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Turkey

Percentage of turkey participation status responses for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Turkey Participation by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	41	25.2	151	27.6	192	27.0
Participate but not every year	21	12.9	140	25.5	161	22.6
No longer participate	13	8.0	93	17.0	106	14.9
Never	70	42.9	138	25.2	208	29.3
No Response	18	11.0	26	4.7	44	6.2
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Turkey Participation by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	2	28.6	212	42.5	214	42.3
Participate but not every year	2	28.6	114	22.8	116	22.9
No longer participate	0	0.0	61	12.2	61	12.1
Never	1	14.3	97	19.4	98	19.4
No Response	2	28.6	15	3.0	17	3.4
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Turkey Participation by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	33	25.0	84	28.8	117	27.6
Participate but not every year	14	10.6	66	22.6	80	18.9
No longer participate	13	9.8	49	16.8	62	14.6
Never	59	44.7	79	27.1	138	32.5
No Response	13	9.8	14	4.8	27	6.4
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Turkey Participation by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	58	87.9	491	93.0	549	92.4
Participate but not every year	3	4.5	32	6.1	35	5.9
No longer participate	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
Never	3	4.5	1	0.2	4	0.7
No Response	2	3.0	3	0.6	5	0.8
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Turkey Participation by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	83	77.6	365	90.1	448	87.5
Participate but not every year	21	19.6	37	9.1	58	11.3
No longer participate	1	0.9	0	0.0	1	0.2
Never	2	1.9	1	0.2	3	0.6
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.5	2	0.4
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Small Game (e.g. Rabbit, Squirrel)

Percentage of small-game participation status responses from each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Small Game Participation by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	27	16.6	115	21.0	142	20.0
Participate but not every year	18	11.0	112	20.4	130	18.3
No longer participate	16	9.8	125	22.8	141	19.8
Never	88	54.0	169	30.8	257	36.1
No Response	14	8.6	27	4.9	41	5.8
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Small Game Participation by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	3	42.9	123	24.6	126	24.9
Participate but not every year	1	14.3	100	20.0	101	20.0
No longer participate	0	0.0	68	13.6	68	13.4
Never	2	28.6	192	38.5	194	38.3
No Response	1	14.3	16	3.2	17	3.4
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Small Game Participation by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	19	14.4	78	26.7	97	22.9
Participate but not every year	13	9.8	49	16.8	62	14.6
No longer participate	11	8.3	45	15.4	56	13.2
Never	76	57.6	107	36.6	183	43.2
No Response	13	9.8	13	4.5	26	6.1
Total	132	100.0	292	100.0	424	100.0

Small Game Participation by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	13	19.7	163	30.9	176	29.6
Participate but not every year	7	10.6	94	17.8	101	17.0
No longer participate	6	9.1	71	13.4	77	13.0
Never	34	51.5	175	33.1	209	35.2
No Response	6	9.1	25	4.7	31	5.2
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Small Game Participation by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Participate every year	9	8.4	144	35.6	153	29.9
Participate but not every year	9	8.4	76	18.8	85	16.6
No longer participate	9	8.4	52	12.8	61	11.9
Never	71	66.4	112	27.7	183	35.7
No Response	9	8.4	21	5.2	30	5.9
Total	107	100.0	405	100.0	512	100.0

Years of Participation

For about how many years have you participated in XXXX hunting?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of years hunting. Bars represent number of years hunting their respective game type (i.e. Number of years deer hunters have hunted for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of years hunting. Bars represent number of years hunting their respective game type (i.e. Number of years deer hunters have hunted for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Number of Years Participating in Deer Hunting

For about how many years have you participated in Deer hunting?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of years hunting Deer. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of years hunting Deer. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Number of Years Participating in Waterfowl Hunting

For about how many years have you participated in Waterfowl hunting?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of years hunting Waterfowl. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of years hunting Waterfowl. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Number of Years Participating in Upland Game Hunting

For about how many years have you participated in Upland Game hunting?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of years hunting Upland Game. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of years hunting Upland Game. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Number of Years Participating in Spring Turkey Hunting

For about how many years have you participated in Spring Turkey hunting?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of years hunting Spring Turkey. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of years hunting Spring Turkey. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Number of Years Participating in Fall Turkey Hunting

For about how many years have you participated in Spring Turkey hunting?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of years hunting Fall Turkey. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of years hunting Fall Turkey. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Survey Section 3: Importance, Performance, and Satisfaction

Participation in Previous Season

Did you hunt XXXX during the XXXX season?

Percentage of hunter participation in the previous season for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Hunter Participation in Previous Season

Did you hunt Deer during the 2018 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	157	96.3	538	98.2	695	97.7
No	6	3.7	10	1.8	16	2.3
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Waterfowl Hunter Participation in Previous Season

Did you hunt Waterfowl during the 2018 - 2019 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	5	71.4	392	78.6	397	78.5
No	2	28.6	107	21.4	109	21.5
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Upland Game Hunter Participation in Previous Season

Did you hunt Upland Game or Small Game in the 2018 - 2019 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	108	81.8	184	63	292	68.9
No	24	18.2	108	37	132	31.1
Total	132	100.0	292	100	424	100.0

Spring Turkey Hunter Participation in Previous Season

Did you hunt Spring Turkey in 2019?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	62	93.9	513	97.2	575	96.8
No	4	6.1	15	2.8	19	3.2
Total	66	100.0	528	100.0	594	100.0

Fall Turkey Hunter Participation in Previous Season

Did you hunt Fall Turkey in 2018?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	92	86	343	84.7	435	85
No	15	14	62	15.3	77	15
Total	107	100	405	100.0	512	100

Importance of Hunting Attributes

The following is a list of experiences that may hold some importance to you as a XXXX hunter. Indicate how important you view each of the following experiences when hunting XXXX.

Importance of Deer Hunting Attributes

Seeing Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 1.69, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.25 (0.89 - 1.76), p-value = 0.19

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	64	40.8	244	45.4	308	44.3
Very important	69	43.9	233	43.3	302	43.5
Moderately important	21	13.4	52	9.7	73	10.5
Slightly important	1	0.6	6	1.1	7	1.0
Not at all important	1	0.6	0	0.0	1	0.1
No Response	1	0.6	3	0.6	4	0.6
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 2.21, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.78 (0.56 - 1.08), p-value = 0.14

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	39	24.8	119	22.1	158	22.7
Very important	70	44.6	222	41.3	292	42.0
Moderately important	35	22.3	167	31.0	202	29.1
Slightly important	9	5.7	26	4.8	35	5.0
Not at all important	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
No Response	4	2.5	2	0.4	6	0.9
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Harvesting Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.07, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.69 - 1.33), p-value = 0.79

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	33	21.0	98	18.2	131	18.8
Very important	39	24.8	153	28.4	192	27.6
Moderately important	61	38.9	207	38.5	268	38.6
Slightly important	18	11.5	62	11.5	80	11.5
Not at all important	3	1.9	12	2.2	15	2.2
No Response	3	1.9	6	1.1	9	1.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Harvesting a Trophy Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 10.95, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.58 (0.42 - 0.8), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	27	17.2	57	10.6	84	12.1
Very important	34	21.7	66	12.3	100	14.4
Moderately important	46	29.3	189	35.1	235	33.8
Slightly important	27	17.2	126	23.4	153	22.0
Not at all important	22	14.0	94	17.5	116	16.7
No Response	1	0.6	6	1.1	7	1.0
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Seeing Sign of Game (e.g., antler rubs, scrapes, tracks) Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.91, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.17 (0.85 - 1.62), p-value = 0.34

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	25	15.9	105	19.5	130	18.7
Very important	67	42.7	224	41.6	291	41.9
Moderately important	47	29.9	153	28.4	200	28.8
Slightly important	14	8.9	44	8.2	58	8.3
Not at all important	3	1.9	7	1.3	10	1.4
No Response	1	0.6	5	0.9	6	0.9
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Calling in Game Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.07, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.69 - 1.32), p-value = 0.79

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	7	4.5	21	3.9	28	4.0
Very important	20	12.7	49	9.1	69	9.9
Moderately important	46	29.3	168	31.2	214	30.8
Slightly important	40	25.5	169	31.4	209	30.1
Not at all important	43	27.4	129	24.0	172	24.7
No Response	1	0.6	2	0.4	3	0.4
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.45, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.12 (0.81 - 1.55), p-value = 0.5

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	7	4.5	21	3.9	28	4.0
Very important	16	10.2	56	10.4	72	10.4
Moderately important	51	32.5	182	33.8	233	33.5
Slightly important	43	27.4	174	32.3	217	31.2
Not at all important	39	24.8	103	19.1	142	20.4
No Response	1	0.6	2	0.4	3	0.4
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.06, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.7 - 1.32), p-value = 0.8

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	33	21.0	108	20.1	141	20.3
Very important	43	27.4	150	27.9	193	27.8
Moderately important	49	31.2	170	31.6	219	31.5
Slightly important	25	15.9	79	14.7	104	15.0
Not at all important	6	3.8	29	5.4	35	5.0
No Response	1	0.6	2	0.4	3	0.4
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.7, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.62 - 1.21), p-value = 0.4

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	76	48.4	255	47.4	331	47.6
Very important	53	33.8	168	31.2	221	31.8
Moderately important	14	8.9	76	14.1	90	12.9
Slightly important	7	4.5	32	5.9	39	5.6
Not at all important	3	1.9	5	0.9	8	1.2
No Response	4	2.5	2	0.4	6	0.9
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 3.35, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.37 (0.98 - 1.91), p-value = 0.07

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	61	38.9	234	43.5	295	42.4
Very important	47	29.9	177	32.9	224	32.2
Moderately important	25	15.9	90	16.7	115	16.5
Slightly important	13	8.3	19	3.5	32	4.6
Not at all important	9	5.7	14	2.6	23	3.3
No Response	2	1.3	4	0.7	6	0.9
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 27.09, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.42 (0.3 - 0.59), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	60	38.2	110	20.4	170	24.5
Very important	39	24.8	97	18.0	136	19.6
Moderately important	22	14.0	128	23.8	150	21.6
Slightly important	16	10.2	98	18.2	114	16.4
Not at all important	19	12.1	101	18.8	120	17.3
No Response	1	0.6	4	0.7	5	0.7
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 13.43, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.4 - 0.76), p-value < 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	52	33.1	119	22.1	171	24.6
Very important	48	30.6	147	27.3	195	28.1
Moderately important	33	21.0	132	24.5	165	23.7
Slightly important	15	9.6	82	15.2	97	14.0
Not at all important	8	5.1	55	10.2	63	9.1
No Response	1	0.6	3	0.6	4	0.6
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Importance of Waterfowl Hunting Attributes

Seeing Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.23, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.52 (0.28 - 8.34), p-value = 0.63

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	2	40	184	46.9	186	46.9
Very important	2	40	166	42.3	168	42.3
Moderately important	1	20	35	8.9	36	9.1
Slightly important	0	0	5	1.3	5	1.3
Not at all important	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 1.87, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.3 (0.05 - 1.78), p-value = 0.17

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	3	60	108	27.6	111	28.0
Very important	1	20	158	40.3	159	40.1
Moderately important	1	20	110	28.1	111	28.0
Slightly important	0	0	14	3.6	14	3.5
Not at all important	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Harvesting Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1 (0.19 - 5.38), p-value = 1

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	20	53	13.5	54	13.6
Very important	1	20	105	26.8	106	26.7
Moderately important	2	40	170	43.4	172	43.3
Slightly important	1	20	50	12.8	51	12.8
Not at all important	0	0	10	2.6	10	2.5
No Response	0	0	4	1.0	4	1.0
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.05, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.21 - 3.47), p-value = 0.82

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	16	4.1	16	4.0
Very important	0	0	29	7.4	29	7.3
Moderately important	2	40	123	31.4	125	31.5
Slightly important	3	60	131	33.4	134	33.8
Not at all important	0	0	92	23.5	92	23.2
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Calling in Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.42, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.14 - 2.71), p-value = 0.52

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	20	85	21.7	86	21.7
Very important	3	60	151	38.5	154	38.8
Moderately important	1	20	100	25.5	101	25.4
Slightly important	0	0	42	10.7	42	10.6
Not at all important	0	0	14	3.6	14	3.5
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s)

\(\chi^2\) = 0.06, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.18 - 3.86), p-value = 0.81

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	20	95	24.2	96	24.2
Very important	3	60	177	45.2	180	45.3
Moderately important	1	20	88	22.4	89	22.4
Slightly important	0	0	23	5.9	23	5.8
Not at all important	0	0	7	1.8	7	1.8
No Response	0	0	2	0.5	2	0.5
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.01, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.93 (0.24 - 3.68), p-value = 0.92

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	29	7.4	29	7.3
Very important	0	0	58	14.8	58	14.6
Moderately important	3	60	114	29.1	117	29.5
Slightly important	2	40	115	29.3	117	29.5
Not at all important	0	0	75	19.1	75	18.9
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.31, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.48 (0.37 - 5.85), p-value = 0.58

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	48	12.2	48	12.1
Very important	0	0	89	22.7	89	22.4
Moderately important	4	80	135	34.4	139	35.0
Slightly important	1	20	88	22.4	89	22.4
Not at all important	0	0	31	7.9	31	7.8
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.18, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.36 (0.32 - 5.72), p-value = 0.67

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	20	166	42.3	167	42.1
Very important	3	60	125	31.9	128	32.2
Moderately important	1	20	55	14.0	56	14.1
Slightly important	0	0	35	8.9	35	8.8
Not at all important	0	0	9	2.3	9	2.3
No Response	0	0	2	0.5	2	0.5
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.29 (0.27 - 6.09), p-value = 0.75

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	20	109	27.8	110	27.7
Very important	2	40	139	35.5	141	35.5
Moderately important	1	20	84	21.4	85	21.4
Slightly important	1	20	38	9.7	39	9.8
Not at all important	0	0	19	4.8	19	4.8
No Response	0	0	3	0.8	3	0.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.32, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.57 (0.08 - 4.04), p-value = 0.57

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	3	60	118	30.1	121	30.5
Very important	0	0	102	26.0	102	25.7
Moderately important	0	0	98	25.0	98	24.7
Slightly important	2	40	44	11.2	46	11.6
Not at all important	0	0	26	6.6	26	6.5
No Response	0	0	4	1.0	4	1.0
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.4, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.69 (0.33 - 8.59), p-value = 0.53

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	20	121	30.9	122	30.7
Very important	2	40	143	36.5	145	36.5
Moderately important	1	20	75	19.1	76	19.1
Slightly important	0	0	34	8.7	34	8.6
Not at all important	1	20	18	4.6	19	4.8
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Using a Dog to Hunt Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 2.13, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 2.81 (0.7 - 11.2), p-value = 0.14

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	93	23.7	93	23.4
Very important	0	0	112	28.6	112	28.2
Moderately important	3	60	69	17.6	72	18.1
Slightly important	1	20	56	14.3	57	14.4
Not at all important	1	20	61	15.6	62	15.6
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Importance of Upland Game Hunting Attributes

Seeing Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 3.91, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.62 (0.39 - 1), p-value = 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	48	46.6	67	38.3	115	41.4
Very important	49	47.6	83	47.4	132	47.5
Moderately important	5	4.9	21	12.0	26	9.4
Slightly important	0	0.0	3	1.7	3	1.1
No Response	1	1.0	1	0.6	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 4.86, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.39 - 0.95), p-value = 0.03

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	32	31.1	46	26.3	78	28.1
Very important	45	43.7	57	32.6	102	36.7
Moderately important	25	24.3	62	35.4	87	31.3
Slightly important	1	1.0	9	5.1	10	3.6
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.6	1	0.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Harvesting Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 2.8, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.68 (0.44 - 1.07), p-value = 0.09

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	20	19.4	32	18.3	52	18.7
Very important	29	28.2	34	19.4	63	22.7
Moderately important	43	41.7	79	45.1	122	43.9
Slightly important	10	9.7	26	14.9	36	12.9
Not at all important	0	0.0	3	1.7	3	1.1
No Response	1	1.0	1	0.6	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 0.88, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.52 - 1.26), p-value = 0.35

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	4	3.9	11	6.3	15	5.4
Very important	8	7.8	9	5.1	17	6.1
Moderately important	36	35.0	43	24.6	79	28.4
Slightly important	28	27.2	66	37.7	94	33.8
Not at all important	26	25.2	44	25.1	70	25.2
No Response	1	1.0	2	1.1	3	1.1
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 0.27, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.12 (0.72 - 1.75), p-value = 0.61

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	2	1.9	5	2.9	7	2.5
Very important	11	10.7	15	8.6	26	9.4
Moderately important	35	34.0	68	38.9	103	37.1
Slightly important	32	31.1	50	28.6	82	29.5
Not at all important	23	22.3	35	20.0	58	20.9
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 4.42, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.62 (0.4 - 0.97), p-value = 0.04

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	10	9.7	9	5.1	19	6.8
Very important	17	16.5	27	15.4	44	15.8
Moderately important	40	38.8	56	32.0	96	34.5
Slightly important	25	24.3	48	27.4	73	26.3
Not at all important	11	10.7	33	18.9	44	15.8
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 0.48, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.86 (0.55 - 1.33), p-value = 0.49

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	36	35.0	55	31.4	91	32.7
Very important	35	34.0	59	33.7	94	33.8
Moderately important	18	17.5	34	19.4	52	18.7
Slightly important	10	9.7	15	8.6	25	9.0
Not at all important	4	3.9	11	6.3	15	5.4
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.6	1	0.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 2.73, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.69 (0.44 - 1.07), p-value = 0.1

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	33	32.0	35	20.0	68	24.5
Very important	32	31.1	65	37.1	97	34.9
Moderately important	24	23.3	47	26.9	71	25.5
Slightly important	7	6.8	21	12.0	28	10.1
Not at all important	6	5.8	5	2.9	11	4.0
No Response	1	1.0	2	1.1	3	1.1
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 6.7, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.35 - 0.87), p-value = 0.01

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	47	45.6	56	32.0	103	37.1
Very important	33	32.0	56	32.0	89	32.0
Moderately important	15	14.6	38	21.7	53	19.1
Slightly important	3	2.9	18	10.3	21	7.6
Not at all important	5	4.9	6	3.4	11	4.0
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.6	1	0.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 11.94, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.46 (0.29 - 0.72), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	26	25.2	26	14.9	52	18.7
Very important	41	39.8	52	29.7	93	33.5
Moderately important	25	24.3	55	31.4	80	28.8
Slightly important	7	6.8	25	14.3	32	11.5
Not at all important	4	3.9	15	8.6	19	6.8
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Using a Dog to Hunt Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 22.12, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.34 (0.21 - 0.53), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	59	57.3	54	30.9	113	40.6
Very important	16	15.5	31	17.7	47	16.9
Moderately important	16	15.5	31	17.7	47	16.9
Slightly important	5	4.9	28	16.0	33	11.9
Not at all important	7	6.8	29	16.6	36	12.9
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Importance of Spring Turkey Hunting Attributes

Seeing Turkeys Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.74, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.43 - 1.18), p-value = 0.19

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	30	48.4	211	41.1	241	41.9
Very important	26	41.9	224	43.7	250	43.5
Moderately important	6	9.7	67	13.1	73	12.7
Slightly important	0	0.0	9	1.8	9	1.6
Not at all important	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Turkey Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 4.89, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.58 (0.36 - 0.94), p-value = 0.03

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	15	24.2	95	18.5	110	19.1
Very important	32	51.6	220	42.9	252	43.8
Moderately important	15	24.2	162	31.6	177	30.8
Slightly important	0	0.0	32	6.2	32	5.6
Not at all important	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
No Response	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.5
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Tom Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 13.74, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.4 (0.25 - 0.65), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	17	27.4	66	12.9	83	14.4
Very important	21	33.9	130	25.3	151	26.3
Moderately important	20	32.3	238	46.4	258	44.9
Slightly important	4	6.5	60	11.7	64	11.1
Not at all important	0	0.0	12	2.3	12	2.1
No Response	0	0.0	7	1.4	7	1.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Jake Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 5.01, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.76 (1.07 - 2.88), p-value = 0.03

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	2	3.2	3	0.6	5	0.9
Very important	4	6.5	36	7.0	40	7.0
Moderately important	14	22.6	198	38.6	212	36.9
Slightly important	17	27.4	139	27.1	156	27.1
Not at all important	25	40.3	132	25.7	157	27.3
No Response	0	0.0	5	1.0	5	0.9
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Bearded Hen Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.21, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.13 (0.67 - 1.89), p-value = 0.64

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	3	4.8	7	1.4	10	1.7
Very important	1	1.6	22	4.3	23	4.0
Moderately important	8	12.9	96	18.7	104	18.1
Slightly important	13	21.0	92	17.9	105	18.3
Not at all important	37	59.7	293	57.1	330	57.4
No Response	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.5
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Trophy Turkey Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.09, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.08 (0.66 - 1.76), p-value = 0.76

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	4	6.5	30	5.8	34	5.9
Very important	9	14.5	53	10.3	62	10.8
Moderately important	17	27.4	180	35.1	197	34.3
Slightly important	13	21.0	121	23.6	134	23.3
Not at all important	19	30.6	128	25.0	147	25.6
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hearing Gobbling Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 2.61, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.66 (0.4 - 1.1), p-value = 0.11

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	30	48.4	197	38.4	227	39.5
Very important	24	38.7	220	42.9	244	42.4
Moderately important	7	11.3	83	16.2	90	15.7
Slightly important	1	1.6	12	2.3	13	2.3
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Calling in Turkeys Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.34, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.75 (0.46 - 1.22), p-value = 0.25

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	23	37.1	161	31.4	184	32.0
Very important	28	45.2	229	44.6	257	44.7
Moderately important	9	14.5	103	20.1	112	19.5
Slightly important	2	3.2	12	2.3	14	2.4
Not at all important	0	0.0	7	1.4	7	1.2
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s) Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.56 - 1.52), p-value = 0.76

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	19	30.6	107	20.9	126	21.9
Very important	17	27.4	215	41.9	232	40.3
Moderately important	19	30.6	128	25.0	147	25.6
Slightly important	4	6.5	40	7.8	44	7.7
Not at all important	3	4.8	17	3.3	20	3.5
No Response	0	0.0	6	1.2	6	1.0
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.05, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.05 (0.66 - 1.69), p-value = 0.83

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	6	9.7	36	7.0	42	7.3
Very important	6	9.7	103	20.1	109	19.0
Moderately important	32	51.6	211	41.1	243	42.3
Slightly important	14	22.6	107	20.9	121	21.0
Not at all important	4	6.5	52	10.1	56	9.7
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.8	4	0.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.49, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.53 - 1.35), p-value = 0.48

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	12	19.4	116	22.6	128	22.3
Very important	22	35.5	125	24.4	147	25.6
Moderately important	20	32.3	185	36.1	205	35.7
Slightly important	4	6.5	59	11.5	63	11.0
Not at all important	3	4.8	21	4.1	24	4.2
No Response	1	1.6	7	1.4	8	1.4
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 3.58, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.37 - 1.02), p-value = 0.06

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	34	54.8	224	43.7	258	44.9
Very important	19	30.6	173	33.7	192	33.4
Moderately important	3	4.8	74	14.4	77	13.4
Slightly important	4	6.5	22	4.3	26	4.5
Not at all important	1	1.6	17	3.3	18	3.1
No Response	1	1.6	3	0.6	4	0.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 2.38, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.46 (0.9 - 2.37), p-value = 0.12

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	18	29.0	194	37.8	212	36.9
Very important	20	32.3	155	30.2	175	30.4
Moderately important	11	17.7	110	21.4	121	21.0
Slightly important	9	14.5	33	6.4	42	7.3
Not at all important	3	4.8	20	3.9	23	4.0
No Response	1	1.6	1	0.2	2	0.3
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.05, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.78 (0.49 - 1.25), p-value = 0.31

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	21	33.9	147	28.7	168	29.2
Very important	14	22.6	127	24.8	141	24.5
Moderately important	17	27.4	122	23.8	139	24.2
Slightly important	8	12.9	63	12.3	71	12.3
Not at all important	2	3.2	51	9.9	53	9.2
No Response	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.5
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.08 (0.67 - 1.72), p-value = 0.76

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	9	14.5	90	17.5	99	17.2
Very important	18	29.0	133	25.9	151	26.3
Moderately important	18	29.0	155	30.2	173	30.1
Slightly important	10	16.1	81	15.8	91	15.8
Not at all important	7	11.3	52	10.1	59	10.3
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Importance of Fall Turkey Hunting Attributes

Seeing Turkeys Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 3.76, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.65 (0.43 - 1.01), p-value = 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	38	41.3	112	32.7	150	34.5
Very important	38	41.3	143	41.7	181	41.6
Moderately important	14	15.2	73	21.3	87	20.0
Slightly important	1	1.1	8	2.3	9	2.1
Not at all important	0	0.0	3	0.9	3	0.7
No Response	1	1.1	4	1.2	5	1.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Turkey Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.44, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.57 - 1.32), p-value = 0.51

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	21	22.8	74	21.6	95	21.8
Very important	35	38.0	120	35.0	155	35.6
Moderately important	29	31.5	119	34.7	148	34.0
Slightly important	6	6.5	21	6.1	27	6.2
Not at all important	0	0.0	5	1.5	5	1.1
No Response	1	1.1	4	1.2	5	1.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Tom Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 3.07, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.68 (0.45 - 1.05), p-value = 0.08

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	11	12.0	36	10.5	47	10.8
Very important	24	26.1	51	14.9	75	17.2
Moderately important	30	32.6	140	40.8	170	39.1
Slightly important	15	16.3	75	21.9	90	20.7
Not at all important	10	10.9	38	11.1	48	11.0
No Response	2	2.2	3	0.9	5	1.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Jake Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.81, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.34 (0.88 - 2.04), p-value = 0.18

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	1.1	10	2.9	11	2.5
Very important	7	7.6	28	8.2	35	8.0
Moderately important	28	30.4	117	34.1	145	33.3
Slightly important	25	27.2	98	28.6	123	28.3
Not at all important	29	31.5	85	24.8	114	26.2
No Response	2	2.2	5	1.5	7	1.6
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Bearded Hen Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.15, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.71 - 1.68), p-value = 0.7

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	2	2.2	10	2.9	12	2.8
Very important	3	3.3	13	3.8	16	3.7
Moderately important	19	20.7	87	25.4	106	24.4
Slightly important	22	23.9	62	18.1	84	19.3
Not at all important	43	46.7	165	48.1	208	47.8
No Response	3	3.3	6	1.7	9	2.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Trophy Turkey Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 2.27, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.47 - 1.1), p-value = 0.13

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	6	6.5	20	5.8	26	6.0
Very important	16	17.4	26	7.6	42	9.7
Moderately important	21	22.8	83	24.2	104	23.9
Slightly important	17	18.5	91	26.5	108	24.8
Not at all important	30	32.6	119	34.7	149	34.3
No Response	2	2.2	4	1.2	6	1.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hearing Gobbling Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 2.83, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.7 (0.46 - 1.06), p-value = 0.09

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	22	23.9	67	19.5	89	20.5
Very important	36	39.1	105	30.6	141	32.4
Moderately important	14	15.2	89	25.9	103	23.7
Slightly important	12	13.0	40	11.7	52	12.0
Not at all important	7	7.6	37	10.8	44	10.1
No Response	1	1.1	5	1.5	6	1.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Breaking up Turkey Flocks Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.92, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.75 (0.49 - 1.13), p-value = 0.17

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	14	15.2	47	13.7	61	14.0
Very important	33	35.9	93	27.1	126	29.0
Moderately important	21	22.8	99	28.9	120	27.6
Slightly important	14	15.2	55	16.0	69	15.9
Not at all important	9	9.8	44	12.8	53	12.2
No Response	1	1.1	5	1.5	6	1.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Calling in Turkeys Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.02, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.63 - 1.5), p-value = 0.9

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	1.1	5	1.5	6	1.4
Very important	6	6.5	28	8.2	34	7.8
Moderately important	19	20.7	57	16.6	76	17.5
Slightly important	21	22.8	86	25.1	107	24.6
Not at all important	42	45.7	160	46.6	202	46.4
No Response	3	3.3	7	2.0	10	2.3
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s) Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.14, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.52 - 1.21), p-value = 0.29

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	9	9.8	29	8.5	38	8.7
Very important	23	25.0	68	19.8	91	20.9
Moderately important	22	23.9	87	25.4	109	25.1
Slightly important	12	13.0	65	19.0	77	17.7
Not at all important	22	23.9	86	25.1	108	24.8
No Response	4	4.3	8	2.3	12	2.8
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.19, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.1 (0.72 - 1.67), p-value = 0.66

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	5	5.4	20	5.8	25	5.7
Very important	15	16.3	52	15.2	67	15.4
Moderately important	27	29.3	124	36.2	151	34.7
Slightly important	24	26.1	74	21.6	98	22.5
Not at all important	19	20.7	70	20.4	89	20.5
No Response	2	2.2	3	0.9	5	1.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 5.04, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.63 (0.42 - 0.94), p-value = 0.02

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	18	19.6	64	18.7	82	18.9
Very important	34	37.0	80	23.3	114	26.2
Moderately important	25	27.2	106	30.9	131	30.1
Slightly important	13	14.1	61	17.8	74	17.0
Not at all important	1	1.1	26	7.6	27	6.2
No Response	1	1.1	6	1.7	7	1.6
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 2.7, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.7 (0.46 - 1.07), p-value = 0.1

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	42	45.7	140	40.8	182	41.8
Very important	32	34.8	95	27.7	127	29.2
Moderately important	13	14.1	65	19.0	78	17.9
Slightly important	3	3.3	24	7.0	27	6.2
Not at all important	1	1.1	13	3.8	14	3.2
No Response	1	1.1	6	1.7	7	1.6
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.08, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.94 (0.63 - 1.42), p-value = 0.78

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	30	32.6	119	34.7	149	34.3
Very important	29	31.5	96	28.0	125	28.7
Moderately important	23	25.0	67	19.5	90	20.7
Slightly important	5	5.4	31	9.0	36	8.3
Not at all important	4	4.3	26	7.6	30	6.9
No Response	1	1.1	4	1.2	5	1.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.79, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.55 - 1.25), p-value = 0.38

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	23	25.0	95	27.7	118	27.1
Very important	29	31.5	78	22.7	107	24.6
Moderately important	19	20.7	74	21.6	93	21.4
Slightly important	10	10.9	43	12.5	53	12.2
Not at all important	8	8.7	49	14.3	57	13.1
No Response	3	3.3	4	1.2	7	1.6
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 4.44, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.42 - 0.97), p-value = 0.04

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	15	16.3	49	14.3	64	14.7
Very important	29	31.5	67	19.5	96	22.1
Moderately important	21	22.8	97	28.3	118	27.1
Slightly important	14	15.2	70	20.4	84	19.3
Not at all important	11	12.0	56	16.3	67	15.4
No Response	2	2.2	4	1.2	6	1.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Importance of Small Game Hunting Attributes

Seeing Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Very important	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Moderately important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Opportunities to Shoot Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Very important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Moderately important	1	100	0	0.0	1	25
Slightly important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Harvesting Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Moderately important	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Slightly important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Slightly important	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Not at all important	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Moderately important	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Slightly important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Not at all important	1	100	0	0.0	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Not Seeing Other Hunters Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Moderately important	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Very important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Moderately important	1	100	0	0.0	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Access to Private Land for Hunting Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	100	2	66.7	3	75
Slightly important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Access to Public Land for Hunting Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Extremely important	1	100	0	0.0	1	25
Very important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Moderately important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Not at all important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Hunting with Other People in My Party Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very important	1	100	2	66.7	3	75
Moderately important	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Using a Dog to Hunt Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Slightly important	1	100	0	0	1	25
Not at all important	0	0	3	100	3	75
Total	1	100	3	100	4	100

Performance of Hunting Attributes

In respect to your expectations for XXXX hunting, how would you rate each of the following aspects of your hunting experience in XXXX?

Performance of Deer Hunting Attributes

Seeing Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 4.86, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.69 (0.5 - 0.96), p-value = 0.03

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	14	8.9	32	5.9	46	6.6
Exceeded expectations	33	21.0	97	18.0	130	18.7
Equal to expectations	76	48.4	247	45.9	323	46.5
Below expectations	27	17.2	123	22.9	150	21.6
Far below expectations	7	4.5	37	6.9	44	6.3
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 2.68, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.76 (0.54 - 1.06), p-value = 0.1

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	14	8.9	28	5.2	42	6.0
Exceeded expectations	30	19.1	80	14.9	110	15.8
Equal to expectations	68	43.3	255	47.4	323	46.5
Below expectations	32	20.4	129	24.0	161	23.2
Far below expectations	13	8.3	42	7.8	55	7.9
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.7	4	0.6
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Harvesting Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 5.52, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.48 - 0.94), p-value = 0.02

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	14	8.9	23	4.3	37	5.3
Exceeded expectations	28	17.8	76	14.1	104	15.0
Equal to expectations	72	45.9	262	48.7	334	48.1
Below expectations	25	15.9	106	19.7	131	18.8
Far below expectations	16	10.2	69	12.8	85	12.2
No Response	2	1.3	2	0.4	4	0.6
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Harvesting a Trophy Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 7.06, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.46 - 0.89), p-value = 0.01

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	11	7.0	13	2.4	24	3.5
Exceeded expectations	16	10.2	39	7.2	55	7.9
Equal to expectations	60	38.2	197	36.6	257	37.0
Below expectations	39	24.8	158	29.4	197	28.3
Far below expectations	28	17.8	125	23.2	153	22.0
No Response	3	1.9	6	1.1	9	1.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Seeing Sign of Game (e.g., antler rubs, scrapes, tracks) Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.15, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.93 (0.66 - 1.32), p-value = 0.7

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	9	5.7	17	3.2	26	3.7
Exceeded expectations	25	15.9	90	16.7	115	16.5
Equal to expectations	90	57.3	314	58.4	404	58.1
Below expectations	28	17.8	97	18.0	125	18.0
Far below expectations	5	3.2	16	3.0	21	3.0
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.7	4	0.6
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Calling in Game Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.08, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.67 - 1.35), p-value = 0.78

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	5	3.2	6	1.1	11	1.6
Exceeded expectations	6	3.8	28	5.2	34	4.9
Equal to expectations	87	55.4	300	55.8	387	55.7
Below expectations	34	21.7	114	21.2	148	21.3
Far below expectations	20	12.7	74	13.8	94	13.5
No Response	5	3.2	16	3.0	21	3.0
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.94 (0.65 - 1.38), p-value = 0.76

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	4.5	24	4.5	31	4.5
Exceeded expectations	27	17.2	84	15.6	111	16.0
Equal to expectations	106	67.5	370	68.8	476	68.5
Below expectations	10	6.4	45	8.4	55	7.9
Far below expectations	6	3.8	11	2.0	17	2.4
No Response	1	0.6	4	0.7	5	0.7
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.54, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.62 - 1.24), p-value = 0.46

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	14	8.9	34	6.3	48	6.9
Exceeded expectations	25	15.9	77	14.3	102	14.7
Equal to expectations	86	54.8	313	58.2	399	57.4
Below expectations	20	12.7	75	13.9	95	13.7
Far below expectations	12	7.6	35	6.5	47	6.8
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.7	4	0.6
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.86, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.61 - 1.19), p-value = 0.35

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	17	10.8	45	8.4	62	8.9
Exceeded expectations	28	17.8	91	16.9	119	17.1
Equal to expectations	80	51.0	281	52.2	361	51.9
Below expectations	20	12.7	69	12.8	89	12.8
Far below expectations	12	7.6	50	9.3	62	8.9
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 0.48, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.13 (0.8 - 1.58), p-value = 0.49

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	21	13.4	76	14.1	97	14.0
Exceeded expectations	23	14.6	92	17.1	115	16.5
Equal to expectations	85	54.1	284	52.8	369	53.1
Below expectations	16	10.2	43	8.0	59	8.5
Far below expectations	11	7.0	41	7.6	52	7.5
No Response	1	0.6	2	0.4	3	0.4
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 3.84, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.69 (0.48 - 1), p-value = 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	6	3.8	23	4.3	29	4.2
Exceeded expectations	21	13.4	53	9.9	74	10.6
Equal to expectations	108	68.8	333	61.9	441	63.5
Below expectations	8	5.1	74	13.8	82	11.8
Far below expectations	13	8.3	43	8.0	56	8.1
No Response	1	0.6	12	2.2	13	1.9
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Deer

\(\chi^2\) = 5.97, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.63 (0.44 - 0.91), p-value = 0.01

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	17	10.8	50	9.3	67	9.6
Exceeded expectations	36	22.9	81	15.1	117	16.8
Equal to expectations	98	62.4	370	68.8	468	67.3
Below expectations	3	1.9	20	3.7	23	3.3
Far below expectations	1	0.6	10	1.9	11	1.6
No Response	2	1.3	7	1.3	9	1.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Performance of Waterfowl Hunting Attributes

Seeing Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.99 (0.21 - 4.67), p-value = 0.99

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	26	6.6	26	6.5
Exceeded expectations	1	20	72	18.4	73	18.4
Equal to expectations	3	60	189	48.2	192	48.4
Below expectations	1	20	91	23.2	92	23.2
Far below expectations	0	0	12	3.1	12	3.0
No Response	0	0	2	0.5	2	0.5
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 1.97, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 3.05 (0.64 - 14.54), p-value = 0.16

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	17	4.3	17	4.3
Exceeded expectations	0	0	69	17.6	69	17.4
Equal to expectations	2	40	182	46.4	184	46.3
Below expectations	3	60	111	28.3	114	28.7
Far below expectations	0	0	12	3.1	12	3.0
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Harvesting Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.26, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.49 (0.32 - 6.88), p-value = 0.61

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	16	4.1	16	4.0
Exceeded expectations	0	0	49	12.5	49	12.3
Equal to expectations	3	60	186	47.4	189	47.6
Below expectations	2	40	119	30.4	121	30.5
Far below expectations	0	0	17	4.3	17	4.3
No Response	0	0	5	1.3	5	1.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.13, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.35 (0.26 - 6.88), p-value = 0.72

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	9	2.3	9	2.3
Exceeded expectations	0	0	31	7.9	31	7.8
Equal to expectations	3	60	188	48.0	191	48.1
Below expectations	1	20	118	30.1	119	30.0
Far below expectations	1	20	43	11.0	44	11.1
No Response	0	0	3	0.8	3	0.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Calling in Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 1.08, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 2.33 (0.48 - 11.17), p-value = 0.3

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	18	4.6	18	4.5
Exceeded expectations	0	0	50	12.8	50	12.6
Equal to expectations	3	60	228	58.2	231	58.2
Below expectations	2	40	78	19.9	80	20.2
Far below expectations	0	0	14	3.6	14	3.5
No Response	0	0	4	1.0	4	1.0
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s)

\(\chi^2\) = 0.71, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.95 (0.42 - 9.08), p-value = 0.4

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	20	5.1	20	5.0
Exceeded expectations	0	0	56	14.3	56	14.1
Equal to expectations	3	60	201	51.3	204	51.4
Below expectations	2	40	98	25.0	100	25.2
Far below expectations	0	0	14	3.6	14	3.5
No Response	0	0	3	0.8	3	0.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.05 (0.18 - 6.09), p-value = 0.95

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	14	3.6	14	3.5
Exceeded expectations	0	0	47	12.0	47	11.8
Equal to expectations	5	100	271	69.1	276	69.5
Below expectations	0	0	46	11.7	46	11.6
Far below expectations	0	0	10	2.6	10	2.5
No Response	0	0	4	1.0	4	1.0
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.37, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.11 - 3.17), p-value = 0.54

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	11	2.8	11	2.8
Exceeded expectations	1	20	59	15.1	60	15.1
Equal to expectations	4	80	259	66.1	263	66.2
Below expectations	0	0	46	11.7	46	11.6
Far below expectations	0	0	15	3.8	15	3.8
No Response	0	0	2	0.5	2	0.5
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 1.04, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.44 (0.1 - 2.05), p-value = 0.31

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	24	6.1	24	6.0
Exceeded expectations	2	40	66	16.8	68	17.1
Equal to expectations	3	60	228	58.2	231	58.2
Below expectations	0	0	45	11.5	45	11.3
Far below expectations	0	0	26	6.6	26	6.5
No Response	0	0	3	0.8	3	0.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.61, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.85 (0.4 - 8.6), p-value = 0.44

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	29	7.4	29	7.3
Exceeded expectations	0	0	67	17.1	67	16.9
Equal to expectations	4	80	222	56.6	226	56.9
Below expectations	1	20	38	9.7	39	9.8
Far below expectations	0	0	33	8.4	33	8.3
No Response	0	0	3	0.8	3	0.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.03 (0.2 - 5.38), p-value = 0.97

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	19	4.8	19	4.8
Exceeded expectations	0	0	50	12.8	50	12.6
Equal to expectations	5	100	252	64.3	257	64.7
Below expectations	0	0	48	12.2	48	12.1
Far below expectations	0	0	18	4.6	18	4.5
No Response	0	0	5	1.3	5	1.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 0.31, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.65 (0.27 - 10.08), p-value = 0.58

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	40	10.2	40	10.1
Exceeded expectations	1	20	91	23.2	92	23.2
Equal to expectations	4	80	241	61.5	245	61.7
Below expectations	0	0	11	2.8	11	2.8
Far below expectations	0	0	4	1.0	4	1.0
No Response	0	0	5	1.3	5	1.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Using a Dog to Hunt Waterfowl

\(\chi^2\) = 1.11, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 2.44 (0.48 - 12.37), p-value = 0.29

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0	33	8.4	33	8.3
Exceeded expectations	0	0	59	15.1	59	14.9
Equal to expectations	4	80	243	62.0	247	62.2
Below expectations	1	20	27	6.9	28	7.1
Far below expectations	0	0	23	5.9	23	5.8
No Response	0	0	7	1.8	7	1.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Performance of Upland Game Hunting Attributes

Seeing Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 16.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.4 (0.25 - 0.63), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	2	1.9	5	2.9	7	2.5
Exceeded expectations	16	15.5	18	10.3	34	12.2
Equal to expectations	55	53.4	55	31.4	110	39.6
Below expectations	25	24.3	68	38.9	93	33.5
Far below expectations	4	3.9	28	16.0	32	11.5
No Response	1	1.0	1	0.6	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 12.66, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.44 (0.28 - 0.69), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	2	1.9	3	1.7	5	1.8
Exceeded expectations	11	10.7	15	8.6	26	9.4
Equal to expectations	58	56.3	62	35.4	120	43.2
Below expectations	25	24.3	66	37.7	91	32.7
Far below expectations	6	5.8	28	16.0	34	12.2
No Response	1	1.0	1	0.6	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Harvesting Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 13.06, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.43 (0.27 - 0.68), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	2	1.9	2	1.1	4	1.4
Exceeded expectations	10	9.7	13	7.4	23	8.3
Equal to expectations	56	54.4	58	33.1	114	41.0
Below expectations	27	26.2	71	40.6	98	35.3
Far below expectations	8	7.8	29	16.6	37	13.3
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 12.07, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.45 (18.62 - 189.62), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	2	1.9	1	0.6	3	1.1
Exceeded expectations	6	5.8	12	6.9	18	6.5
Equal to expectations	53	51.5	48	27.4	101	36.3
Below expectations	27	26.2	67	38.3	94	33.8
Far below expectations	15	14.6	45	25.7	60	21.6
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 2.19, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.36 - 1.15), p-value = 0.14

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	2	1.9	3	1.7	5	1.8
Exceeded expectations	22	21.4	22	12.6	44	15.8
Equal to expectations	74	71.8	142	81.1	216	77.7
Below expectations	3	2.9	6	3.4	9	3.2
Far below expectations	2	1.9	1	0.6	3	1.1
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.6	1	0.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 7.22, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.49 (0.29 - 0.83), p-value = 0.01

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	4	3.9	5	2.9	9	3.2
Exceeded expectations	28	27.2	20	11.4	48	17.3
Equal to expectations	60	58.3	127	72.6	187	67.3
Below expectations	8	7.8	18	10.3	26	9.4
Far below expectations	3	2.9	4	2.3	7	2.5
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.6	1	0.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 0.81, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.48 - 1.31), p-value = 0.37

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	6	5.8	9	5.1	15	5.4
Exceeded expectations	23	22.3	30	17.1	53	19.1
Equal to expectations	62	60.2	118	67.4	180	64.7
Below expectations	7	6.8	11	6.3	18	6.5
Far below expectations	3	2.9	6	3.4	9	3.2
No Response	2	1.9	1	0.6	3	1.1
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 12.76, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.41 (0.25 - 0.68), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	9	8.7	4	2.3	13	4.7
Exceeded expectations	16	15.5	24	13.7	40	14.4
Equal to expectations	66	64.1	94	53.7	160	57.6
Below expectations	6	5.8	31	17.7	37	13.3
Far below expectations	4	3.9	19	10.9	23	8.3
No Response	2	1.9	3	1.7	5	1.8
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 5.3, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.54 (0.32 - 0.92), p-value = 0.02

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	5	4.9	5	2.9	10	3.6
Exceeded expectations	15	14.6	23	13.1	38	13.7
Equal to expectations	76	73.8	114	65.1	190	68.3
Below expectations	5	4.9	26	14.9	31	11.2
Far below expectations	1	1.0	6	3.4	7	2.5
No Response	1	1.0	1	0.6	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Hunting with Other People in my Party Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 3.75, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.57 (0.32 - 1.01), p-value = 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	6.8	8	4.6	15	5.4
Exceeded expectations	16	15.5	20	11.4	36	12.9
Equal to expectations	79	76.7	134	76.6	213	76.6
Below expectations	0	0.0	11	6.3	11	4.0
Far below expectations	1	1.0	0	0.0	1	0.4
No Response	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Using a Dog to Hunt Upland

\(\chi^2\) = 3.47, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.39 - 1.03), p-value = 0.06

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	15	14.6	22	12.6	37	13.3
Exceeded expectations	15	14.6	21	12.0	36	12.9
Equal to expectations	67	65.0	98	56.0	165	59.4
Below expectations	3	2.9	17	9.7	20	7.2
Far below expectations	3	2.9	13	7.4	16	5.8
No Response	0	0.0	4	2.3	4	1.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Performance of Spring Turkey Hunting Attributes

Seeing Turkeys Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 11.85, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.43 (0.27 - 0.7), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	11.3	26	5.1	33	5.7
Exceeded expectations	14	22.6	99	19.3	113	19.7
Equal to expectations	36	58.1	235	45.8	271	47.1
Below expectations	4	6.5	116	22.6	120	20.9
Far below expectations	0	0.0	35	6.8	35	6.1
No Response	1	1.6	2	0.4	3	0.5
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Turkey Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 12, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.43 (0.26 - 0.69), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	11.3	23	4.5	30	5.2
Exceeded expectations	13	21.0	87	17.0	100	17.4
Equal to expectations	33	53.2	227	44.2	260	45.2
Below expectations	8	12.9	120	23.4	128	22.3
Far below expectations	0	0.0	52	10.1	52	9.0
No Response	1	1.6	4	0.8	5	0.9
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Tom Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 12.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.42 (0.26 - 0.69), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	9	14.5	26	5.1	35	6.1
Exceeded expectations	8	12.9	74	14.4	82	14.3
Equal to expectations	34	54.8	230	44.8	264	45.9
Below expectations	7	11.3	101	19.7	108	18.8
Far below expectations	1	1.6	78	15.2	79	13.7
No Response	3	4.8	4	0.8	7	1.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Jake Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.31, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.74 (0.44 - 1.24), p-value = 0.25

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	1	1.6	8	1.6	9	1.6
Exceeded expectations	2	3.2	35	6.8	37	6.4
Equal to expectations	39	62.9	262	51.1	301	52.3
Below expectations	9	14.5	91	17.7	100	17.4
Far below expectations	7	11.3	98	19.1	105	18.3
No Response	4	6.5	19	3.7	23	4.0
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Bearded hen Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.76, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.8 (0.48 - 1.32), p-value = 0.38

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.5
Exceeded expectations	0	0.0	19	3.7	19	3.3
Equal to expectations	35	56.5	224	43.7	259	45.0
Below expectations	10	16.1	106	20.7	116	20.2
Far below expectations	14	22.6	141	27.5	155	27.0
No Response	3	4.8	20	3.9	23	4.0
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Harvesting a Trophy Turkey Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 7.74, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.49 (0.29 - 0.81), p-value = 0.01

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	5	8.1	11	2.1	16	2.8
Exceeded expectations	6	9.7	47	9.2	53	9.2
Equal to expectations	35	56.5	242	47.2	277	48.2
Below expectations	9	14.5	110	21.4	119	20.7
Far below expectations	5	8.1	90	17.5	95	16.5
No Response	2	3.2	13	2.5	15	2.6
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hearing Gobbling Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 4.69, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.37 - 0.95), p-value = 0.03

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	9	14.5	50	9.7	59	10.3
Exceeded expectations	13	21.0	110	21.4	123	21.4
Equal to expectations	33	53.2	225	43.9	258	44.9
Below expectations	5	8.1	91	17.7	96	16.7
Far below expectations	0	0.0	33	6.4	33	5.7
No Response	2	3.2	4	0.8	6	1.0
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Calling in Turkeys Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.78, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.5 - 1.3), p-value = 0.38

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	6	9.7	44	8.6	50	8.7
Exceeded expectations	10	16.1	93	18.1	103	17.9
Equal to expectations	31	50.0	210	40.9	241	41.9
Below expectations	11	17.7	120	23.4	131	22.8
Far below expectations	3	4.8	42	8.2	45	7.8
No Response	1	1.6	4	0.8	5	0.9
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s) Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 5.83, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.35 - 0.9), p-value = 0.02

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	4	6.5	33	6.4	37	6.4
Exceeded expectations	12	19.4	73	14.2	85	14.8
Equal to expectations	33	53.2	200	39.0	233	40.5
Below expectations	8	12.9	140	27.3	148	25.7
Far below expectations	4	6.5	61	11.9	65	11.3
No Response	1	1.6	6	1.2	7	1.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.54, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.23 (0.71 - 2.13), p-value = 0.46

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	4	6.5	29	5.7	33	5.7
Exceeded expectations	11	17.7	110	21.4	121	21.0
Equal to expectations	36	58.1	318	62.0	354	61.6
Below expectations	7	11.3	46	9.0	53	9.2
Far below expectations	2	3.2	8	1.6	10	1.7
No Response	2	3.2	2	0.4	4	0.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.18, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.9 (0.55 - 1.47), p-value = 0.67

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	11.3	59	11.5	66	11.5
Exceeded expectations	14	22.6	131	25.5	145	25.2
Equal to expectations	36	58.1	255	49.7	291	50.6
Below expectations	2	3.2	50	9.7	52	9.0
Far below expectations	1	1.6	15	2.9	16	2.8
No Response	2	3.2	3	0.6	5	0.9
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.1, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.57 - 1.5), p-value = 0.75

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	9	14.5	74	14.4	83	14.4
Exceeded expectations	14	22.6	124	24.2	138	24.0
Equal to expectations	34	54.8	250	48.7	284	49.4
Below expectations	2	3.2	43	8.4	45	7.8
Far below expectations	2	3.2	18	3.5	20	3.5
No Response	1	1.6	4	0.8	5	0.9
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.22, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.13 (0.68 - 1.88), p-value = 0.64

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	11.3	64	12.5	71	12.3
Exceeded expectations	11	17.7	106	20.7	117	20.3
Equal to expectations	36	58.1	275	53.6	311	54.1
Below expectations	2	3.2	37	7.2	39	6.8
Far below expectations	5	8.1	25	4.9	30	5.2
No Response	1	1.6	6	1.2	7	1.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.12, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.54 - 1.54), p-value = 0.73

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	3	4.8	32	6.2	35	6.1
Exceeded expectations	7	11.3	65	12.7	72	12.5
Equal to expectations	42	67.7	313	61.0	355	61.7
Below expectations	6	9.7	52	10.1	58	10.1
Far below expectations	2	3.2	41	8.0	43	7.5
No Response	2	3.2	10	1.9	12	2.1
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Spring Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.46, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.2 (0.7 - 2.06), p-value = 0.5

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	4	6.5	52	10.1	56	9.7
Exceeded expectations	13	21.0	93	18.1	106	18.4
Equal to expectations	34	54.8	304	59.3	338	58.8
Below expectations	1	1.6	25	4.9	26	4.5
Far below expectations	8	12.9	31	6.0	39	6.8
No Response	2	3.2	8	1.6	10	1.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Performance of Fall Turkey Hunting Attributes

Seeing Turkeys Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 3.73, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.65 (0.42 - 1.01), p-value = 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	12	13.0	20	5.8	32	7.4
Exceeded expectations	15	16.3	46	13.4	61	14.0
Equal to expectations	37	40.2	159	46.4	196	45.1
Below expectations	21	22.8	76	22.2	97	22.3
Far below expectations	5	5.4	35	10.2	40	9.2
No Response	2	2.2	7	2.0	9	2.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Opportunities to Shoot Turkey Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 4.99, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.39 - 0.94), p-value = 0.03

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	7.6	19	5.5	26	6.0
Exceeded expectations	19	20.7	34	9.9	53	12.2
Equal to expectations	31	33.7	144	42.0	175	40.2
Below expectations	24	26.1	94	27.4	118	27.1
Far below expectations	7	7.6	46	13.4	53	12.2
No Response	4	4.3	6	1.7	10	2.3
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Tom Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.02, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.03 (0.67 - 1.57), p-value = 0.9

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	1	1.1	10	2.9	11	2.5
Exceeded expectations	7	7.6	31	9.0	38	8.7
Equal to expectations	41	44.6	147	42.9	188	43.2
Below expectations	27	29.3	83	24.2	110	25.3
Far below expectations	12	13.0	60	17.5	72	16.6
No Response	4	4.3	12	3.5	16	3.7
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Jake Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.04, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.62 - 1.48), p-value = 0.85

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	1	1.1	5	1.5	6	1.4
Exceeded expectations	3	3.3	14	4.1	17	3.9
Equal to expectations	43	46.7	158	46.1	201	46.2
Below expectations	25	27.2	83	24.2	108	24.8
Far below expectations	15	16.3	69	20.1	84	19.3
No Response	5	5.4	14	4.1	19	4.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Bearded Hen Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.06, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.61 - 1.46), p-value = 0.8

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	0	0.0	4	1.2	4	0.9
Exceeded expectations	2	2.2	9	2.6	11	2.5
Equal to expectations	42	45.7	149	43.4	191	43.9
Below expectations	23	25.0	84	24.5	107	24.6
Far below expectations	19	20.7	81	23.6	100	23.0
No Response	6	6.5	16	4.7	22	5.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvesting a Trophy Turkey Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.01, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.98 (0.64 - 1.51), p-value = 0.94

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	1	1.1	7	2.0	8	1.8
Exceeded expectations	2	2.2	13	3.8	15	3.4
Equal to expectations	43	46.7	149	43.4	192	44.1
Below expectations	26	28.3	87	25.4	113	26.0
Far below expectations	16	17.4	70	20.4	86	19.8
No Response	4	4.3	17	5.0	21	4.8
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hearing Gobbling Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.56, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.84 (0.54 - 1.31), p-value = 0.45

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	9	9.8	18	5.2	27	6.2
Exceeded expectations	9	9.8	37	10.8	46	10.6
Equal to expectations	42	45.7	155	45.2	197	45.3
Below expectations	17	18.5	88	25.7	105	24.1
Far below expectations	12	13.0	34	9.9	46	10.6
No Response	3	3.3	11	3.2	14	3.2
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Breaking up Turkey Flocks Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.12, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.93 (0.6 - 1.44), p-value = 0.73

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	3	3.3	12	3.5	15	3.4
Exceeded expectations	5	5.4	27	7.9	32	7.4
Equal to expectations	47	51.1	150	43.7	197	45.3
Below expectations	17	18.5	96	28.0	113	26.0
Far below expectations	15	16.3	48	14.0	63	14.5
No Response	5	5.4	10	2.9	15	3.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Calling in Turkeys Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.12, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.51 - 1.23), p-value = 0.29

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	1	1.1	6	1.7	7	1.6
Exceeded expectations	6	6.5	14	4.1	20	4.6
Equal to expectations	43	46.7	143	41.7	186	42.8
Below expectations	20	21.7	94	27.4	114	26.2
Far below expectations	18	19.6	72	21.0	90	20.7
No Response	4	4.3	14	4.1	18	4.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s) Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 1.44, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.76 (0.49 - 1.19), p-value = 0.23

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	3	3.3	10	2.9	13	3.0
Exceeded expectations	6	6.5	16	4.7	22	5.1
Equal to expectations	43	46.7	149	43.4	192	44.1
Below expectations	19	20.7	90	26.2	109	25.1
Far below expectations	15	16.3	65	19.0	80	18.4
No Response	6	6.5	13	3.8	19	4.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 2.17, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.7 (0.44 - 1.12), p-value = 0.14

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	4	4.3	11	3.2	15	3.4
Exceeded expectations	20	21.7	56	16.3	76	17.5
Equal to expectations	54	58.7	213	62.1	267	61.4
Below expectations	6	6.5	33	9.6	39	9.0
Far below expectations	5	5.4	21	6.1	26	6.0
No Response	3	3.3	9	2.6	12	2.8
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Not Seeing Other Hunters Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 3.88, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.41 - 1), p-value = 0.05

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	12	13.0	34	9.9	46	10.6
Exceeded expectations	22	23.9	56	16.3	78	17.9
Equal to expectations	46	50.0	191	55.7	237	54.5
Below expectations	5	5.4	35	10.2	40	9.2
Far below expectations	4	4.3	14	4.1	18	4.1
No Response	3	3.3	13	3.8	16	3.7
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 4.04, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.63 (0.41 - 0.99), p-value = 0.04

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	16	17.4	38	11.1	54	12.4
Exceeded expectations	21	22.8	62	18.1	83	19.1
Equal to expectations	42	45.7	185	53.9	227	52.2
Below expectations	6	6.5	35	10.2	41	9.4
Far below expectations	4	4.3	13	3.8	17	3.9
No Response	3	3.3	10	2.9	13	3.0
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Access to Private Land for Hunting Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 4.17, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.63 (0.4 - 0.98), p-value = 0.04

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	14	15.2	43	12.5	57	13.1
Exceeded expectations	20	21.7	42	12.2	62	14.3
Equal to expectations	44	47.8	193	56.3	237	54.5
Below expectations	8	8.7	33	9.6	41	9.4
Far below expectations	3	3.3	21	6.1	24	5.5
No Response	3	3.3	11	3.2	14	3.2
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Access to Public Land for Hunting Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 0.37, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.55 - 1.38), p-value = 0.54

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	5	5.4	20	5.8	25	5.7
Exceeded expectations	7	7.6	30	8.7	37	8.5
Equal to expectations	62	67.4	200	58.3	262	60.2
Below expectations	10	10.9	49	14.3	59	13.6
Far below expectations	6	6.5	29	8.5	35	8.0
No Response	2	2.2	15	4.4	17	3.9
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hunting with Other People in My Party Fall Turkey

\(\chi^2\) = 5.67, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.57 (0.36 - 0.9), p-value = 0.02

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Far exceeded expectations	7	7.6	31	9.0	38	8.7
Exceeded expectations	18	19.6	35	10.2	53	12.2
Equal to expectations	57	62.0	213	62.1	270	62.1
Below expectations	1	1.1	32	9.3	33	7.6
Far below expectations	4	4.3	22	6.4	26	6.0
No Response	5	5.4	10	2.9	15	3.4
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Performance of Small Game Hunting Attributes

Seeing Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Equal to expectations	1	100	3	100	4	100
Total	1	100	3	100	4	100

Opportunities to Shoot Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Exceeded expectations	1	100	0	0	1	25
Equal to expectations	0	0	3	100	3	75
Total	1	100	3	100	4	100

Harvesting Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Exceeded expectations	1	100	0	0	1	25
Equal to expectations	0	0	3	100	3	75
Total	1	100	3	100	4	100

Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Animals Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Equal to expectations	1	100	2	66.7	3	75
Below expectations	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Equal to expectations	1	100	3	100	4	100
Total	1	100	3	100	4	100

Not Seeing Other Hunters Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Equal to expectations	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Below expectations	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Equal to expectations	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Below expectations	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Far below expectations	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Access to Private Land for Hunting Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Exceeded expectations	1	100	0	0.0	1	25
Equal to expectations	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Below expectations	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Access to Public Land for Hunting Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Exceeded expectations	1	100	0	0	1	25
Equal to expectations	0	0	3	100	3	75
Total	1	100	3	100	4	100

Hunting with Other People in My Party Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Exceeded expectations	0	0	1	33.3	1	25
Equal to expectations	1	100	2	66.7	3	75
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Using a Dog to Hunt Small Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Equal to expectations	1	100	1	33.3	2	50
Far below expectations	0	0	2	66.7	2	50
Total	1	100	3	100.0	4	100

Overall Satisfaction

Overall, how satisfied were you with your XXXX hunting experience in XXXX?

Percentage of hunter response for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Overall Satisfaction by District

Percentage of hunter response in the NORTHWEST district for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of hunter response in the SOUTHWEST district for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of hunter response in the NORTHEAST district for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of hunter response in the SOUTHEAST district for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Overall Satisfaction of Deer Hunters

Overall, how satisfied were you with your Deer hunting experience in 2019?

\(\chi^2\) = 22.9, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.5 - 0.75), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	266	50.3	309	36.4	575	41.8
Somewhat satisfied	135	25.5	274	32.3	409	29.7
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	48	9.1	95	11.2	143	10.4
Somewhat dissatisfied	77	14.6	138	16.3	215	15.6
Very dissatisfied	3	0.6	30	3.5	33	2.4
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.2	2	0.1
Total	529	100.0	848	100.0	1377	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the overall deer hunting experience by self-reported frequency of participating in deer hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 3.36, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 0.44 (0.18-1.08), p-value: 0.06

Satisfaction with Number of Birds Allowed in Bag Limit by Waterfowl Hunters

The number of birds allowed in the daily bag limit

\(\chi^2\) = 0.45, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.09 - 3.27), p-value = 0.5

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	3	60	365	42.6	368	42.7
Somewhat satisfied	1	20	189	22.1	190	22.0
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	0	0	211	24.6	211	24.5
Somewhat dissatisfied	1	20	87	10.2	88	10.2
Very dissatisfied	0	0	5	0.6	5	0.6
Total	5	100	857	100.0	862	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the number of birds allowed in the daily bag limit by self-reported frequency of participating in waterfowl hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 1.07, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 1.78 (0.60-5.34), p-value: 0.30

Satisfaction with Number of Days in the Season by Waterfowl Hunters

The number of days in the season daily bag limit

\(\chi^2\) = 0.03, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.19 - 3.96), p-value = 0.86

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	1	20	237	27.7	238	27.6
Somewhat satisfied	3	60	300	35.0	303	35.2
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	0	0	156	18.2	156	18.1
Somewhat dissatisfied	1	20	136	15.9	137	15.9
Very dissatisfied	0	0	27	3.2	27	3.1
No Response	0	0	1	0.1	1	0.1
Total	5	100	857	100.0	862	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the number of days in the season by self-reported frequency of participating in waterfowl hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 0.02, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 0.92 (0.33-2.56), p-value: 0.88

Satisfaction with Quality of Habitat by Waterfowl Hunters

Quality of habitat where you hunted

\(\chi^2\) = 0.56, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.86 (0.36 - 9.58), p-value = 0.46

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	0	0	315	36.8	315	36.5
Somewhat satisfied	3	60	225	26.3	228	26.5
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	0	0	240	28.0	240	27.8
Somewhat dissatisfied	1	20	68	7.9	69	8.0
Very dissatisfied	0	0	6	0.7	6	0.7
No Response	1	20	3	0.4	4	0.5
Total	5	100	857	100.0	862	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the quality of habitat by self-reported frequency of participating in waterfowl hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 0.62, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 1.15 (0.39-3.38), p-value: 0.80

Satisfaction with Number of Public Places to Hunt by Waterfowl Hunters

The number of public places available to hunt

\(\chi^2\) = 0.01, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.17 - 4.85), p-value = 0.91

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	0	0	68	7.9	68	7.9
Somewhat satisfied	2	40	134	15.6	136	15.8
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	1	20	322	37.6	323	37.5
Somewhat dissatisfied	1	20	232	27.1	233	27.0
Very dissatisfied	1	20	97	11.3	98	11.4
No Response	0	0	4	0.5	4	0.5
Total	5	100	857	100.0	862	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the number of public places to hunt by self-reported frequency of participating in waterfowl hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 0.139, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 0.83 (0.30-2.32), p-value: 0.72

Overall Satisfaction of Waterfowl Hunters

Overall, how satisfied were you with your Waterfowl hunting experience in the 2019 - 2020 season?

\(\chi^2\) = 0.01, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.15 - 5.36), p-value = 0.91

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	1	20	100	11.7	101	11.7
Somewhat satisfied	2	40	392	45.7	394	45.7
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	1	20	283	33.0	284	32.9
Somewhat dissatisfied	1	20	71	8.3	72	8.4
Very dissatisfied	0	0	9	1.1	9	1.0
No Response	0	0	2	0.2	2	0.2
Total	5	100	857	100.0	862	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the overall waterfowl hunting experience by self-reported frequency of participating in deer hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 0.25, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 1.32 (0.45-3.82), p-value: 0.62

Overall Satisfaction of Upland Game Hunters

Overall, how satisfied were you with your Upland Game hunting experience in the 2019 - 2020 season?

\(\chi^2\) = 269.05, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.11 (0.08 - 0.15), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	226	44.7	22	5.6	248	27.6
Somewhat satisfied	187	37.0	50	12.8	237	26.4
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	15	3.0	188	48.0	203	22.6
Somewhat dissatisfied	10	2.0	76	19.4	86	9.6
Very dissatisfied	68	13.4	55	14.0	123	13.7
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.3	1	0.1
Total	506	100.0	392	100.0	898	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the overall upland game hunting experience by self-reported frequency of participating in upland game hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 0.42, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 1.28 (0.61-2.67), p-value: 0.51

Overall Satisfaction of Spring Turkey Hunters

Overall, how satisfied were you with your Spring Turkey hunting experience in 2020?

\(\chi^2\) = 8.76, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.68 (0.53 - 0.88), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	99	39.9	296	42.3	395	41.7
Somewhat satisfied	109	44.0	148	21.2	257	27.1
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	34	13.7	101	14.4	135	14.3
Somewhat dissatisfied	5	2.0	88	12.6	93	9.8
Very dissatisfied	1	0.4	62	8.9	63	6.7
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.6	4	0.4
Total	248	100.0	699	100.0	947	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the overall spring turkey hunting experience by self-reported frequency of participating in turkey hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 1.82, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 1.53 (0.83-2.85), p-value: 0.18

Overall Satisfaction of Fall Turkey Hunters

Overall, how satisfied were you with your Fall Turkey hunting experience in 2019?

\(\chi^2\) = 23.7, Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 0.5 (0.37 - 0.66), p-value = 0

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	103	41.7	127	25.5	230	30.9
Somewhat satisfied	87	35.2	192	38.6	279	37.4
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	38	15.4	110	22.1	148	19.9
Somewhat dissatisfied	17	6.9	52	10.4	69	9.3
Very dissatisfied	1	0.4	15	3.0	16	2.1
No Response	1	0.4	2	0.4	3	0.4
Total	247	100.0	498	100.0	745	100.0

Probability of response for satisfaction with the overall fall turkey hunting experience by self-reported frequency of participating in turkey hunting. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square: 0.53, Odds Ratio (95% CI): 0.80 (0.44-1.46), p-value: 0.47

Overall Satisfaction of Small Game Hunters

Overall, how satisfied were you with your Upland Game hunting experience in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Very satisfied	32	100	0	0.0	32	25
Somewhat satisfied	0	0	64	66.7	64	50
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied	0	0	32	33.3	32	25
Total	32	100	96	100.0	128	100

Importance Grid Analyses (IGA)

Importance Grid Analysis (IGA) compares explicit rating to implicit importance ratings derived by multiple regression of overall satisfaction on attribute performance ratings (Matzler and Sauerwein 2002, Matzler et al. 2003). Originally employed by Vavra (1997), IGA was used to describe attributes as either excitement, performance, or basic typologies. However, the value of IGA for classifying attributes has since been discounted, and IGA is currently recognized for the ability to distinguish between explicit and implicit importance of attributes (Smith and Deppa 2009, Mikulić and Prebežac 2011). Explicit importance reflects a rational assessment of how one expects an attribute to impact satisfaction, while implicit importance reflects the experiential-based impact of an attribute on satisfaction. IGA delineates differences between hunters’ “expectations of an attributes’ relevancy to a desired end” (i.e., explicit importance) compared to “experiential information gained from one’s real-time encounter” (i.e., implicit importance) (Smith and Deppa 2009, Schroeder et al. 2018).

Explicit importance is calculated by taking the mean rating of each attribute importance as measured from the questionnaire. Implicit importance is derived from multiple linear regression coefficients (performance values of each attribute as the independent variables and overall satisfaction as the dependent variable). Explicit means and implicit coefficients are then plotted, and attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction.

Deer IGA

IGA for deer hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Resident Deer IGA

 

IGA for RESIDENT deer hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Non-resident Deer IGA

 

IGA for NON-RESIDENT deer hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Most Important Hunting Activity Deer IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel deer hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Deer IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel deer hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL importnat hunting activities. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Deer IGA

 

IGA for deer hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Deer IGA

 

IGA for deer hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Deer IGA

 

IGA for deer hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Deer IGA

 

IGA for deer hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Deer, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Deer, Harvest = Harvesting Deer, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Deer, Sign = Seeing Sign of Game, Calling in Deer = Calling in Game, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for waterfowl hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Resident Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for RESIDENT waterfowl hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Non-resident Waterfowl IGA

Non-resident waterfowl hunters were not targeted in the 2020 survey year. Therefore, too few non-residents responded to conduct IGA.

Most Important Hunting Activity Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel waterfowl hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel waterfowl hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL importnat hunting activities. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for waterfowl hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for waterfowl hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for waterfowl hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Waterfowl IGA

 

IGA for waterfowl hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Waterfowl, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Waterfowl, Harvest = Harvesting Waterfowl, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Waterfowl, Calling in Birds = Calling in Waterfowl, Birds come to Decoys = Having Waterfowl Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for upland game hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Resident Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for RESIDENT upland game hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Non-resident Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for NON-RESIDENT upland game hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Most Important Hunting Activity Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel upland game hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel upland game hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL importnat hunting activities. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for upland game hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for upland game hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for upland game hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Upland Game IGA

 

IGA for upland game hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Game Birds, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Game Birds, Harvest = Harvesting Game Birds, Harvest Bag = Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit of Game Birds, Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party, Dog = Using a Dog to Hunt

Spring Turkey IGA

IGA for spring turkey hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Resident Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for RESIDENT spring turkey hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Non-resident Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for NON-RESIDENT spring turkey hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Most Important Hunting Activity Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel spring turkey hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel spring turkey hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL importnat hunting activities. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for spring turkey hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for spring turkey hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for spring turkey hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Spring Turkey IGA

 

IGA for spring turkey hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Fall Turkey IGA

IGA for fall turkey hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Resident Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for RESIDENT fall turkey hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Non-resident Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for NON-RESIDENT fall turkey hunters. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Most Important Hunting Activity Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel fall turkey hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for hunters who feel fall turkey hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL importnat hunting activities. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for fall turkey hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for fall turkey hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for fall turkey hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Fall Turkey IGA

 

IGA for fall turkey hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes above the fit line have higher than expected levels of implicit performance. Attributes below the line are experiences that have a lower than expected effect on satisfaction. See Game = Seeing Turkeys, Opportunity to Harvest = Opportunities to Shoot Turkey, Harvest Tom = Harvesting a Tom, Harvest Jake = Harvesting a Jake, Harvest Hen = Harvesting a Bearded Hen, Trophy = Harvesting a Trophy Turkey, Gobble = Hearing Gobbling, Breaking Flocks = Breaking up Turkey flocks, Decoy = Having Turkeys Come into My Decoy(s), Weather = Hunting in Favorable Weather Conditions, NO interference = Not Being Interfered with by Other Hunters, Private = Access to Private Land for Hunting, Public = Access to Public Land for Hunting, Hunt with Others = Hunting with Other People in My Party

Penalty-Reward-Contrast Analyses (PRCA)

Penalty-Reward-Contrast Analysis (PRCA) is described as the three-factor theory in that it identifies the following three factors to customer satisfaction: basic factors, performance factors, and excitement factors (Deng 2007, Deng et al. 2008, Kim et al. 2014). Basic factors will induce dissatisfaction if expectations with a given attribute are not met, but will not increase satisfaction if expectations are met or exceeded. Basic factors can be viewed as the minimum requirements for a product or experience. Performance factors will increase satisfaction if expectations are fulfilled or exceeded and dissatisfaction if expectations are not fulfilled. Excitement factors will increase satisfaction if delivered but do not cause dissatisfaction if they are missing. For example, the three-factory theory can be applied in the airline service industry. Safety can be viewed as a basic factor insofar as passengers expect to be safe during the flight. If safety expectations are met, then safety attributes will not induce customer dissatisfaction; nor will customers become more satisfied with their experience based on safety attributes alone. However, if passengers feel unsafe, lack of safety will induce dissatisfaction. Expediency in retrieving baggage after the flight might be viewed as a performance factor. If passengers must wait longer than expected to retrieve their baggage, they will become dissatisfied, but if they can claim their baggage more quickly than expected, passengers will be more satisfied with their experience. Quality or price of snacks and beverages during the flight may be viewed as an excitement factor. If the quality of snacks is excellent, passengers will be more satisfied, but lack of quality will not induce dissatisfaction.

Conducting the PRCA incorporates a 3-step process which examines influence on overall satisfaction at high and low-performance levels. In step 1, a simple linear regression is performed, and significant factors (performance ratings (1 to 5)) are recoded into Penalty and Reward dummy variables. If a respondent answered that the performance of an attribute was a “1,” their Penalty value would be a “1” and their Reward value would be a “0.” A rating of a “5” for a performance attribute would result in a Penalty value of “0” and a Reward value of “1.” A performance of rating of “2,” “3,” or “4” would result in a “0” for both Penalty and Reward values. Step 2 consists of a multiple regression with the dummy variables used, independent variables and overall satisfaction with the hunting experience as the dependent variable. The 3rd step is classification of attributes (basic, performance, excitement, or unimportant). An attribute is considered basic if the Penalty variable is significant and the reward variable is not significant, performance if both Penalty and Reward variables are significant, and excitement if the only the Reward variable is significant. Attribute is considered unimportant if neither Penalty nor Reward variables are significant.

Deer PRCA

PRCA for deer hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Resident Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for RESIDENT deer hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Non-resident Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for NON-RESIDENT deer hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Most Important Hunting Activity Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for hunters who feel deer hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for hunters who feel deer hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL important hunting activities. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for deer hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.e

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for deer hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for deer hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for deer hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Waterfowl PRCA

PRCA for waterfowl hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Resident Waterfowl PRCA

 

PRCA for RESIDENT waterfowl hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Non-resident Waterfowl PRCA

Non-residents were not targeted for the waterfowl questionnaire.

Most Important Hunting Activity Waterfowl PRCA

No significant attributes were identified in the PRCA regression for waterfowl hunters who stated that waterfowl hunting was their most important hunting activity

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Deer PRCA

 

PRCA for hunters who feel waterfowl hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL important hunting activities. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Waterfowl PRCA

 

PRCA for waterfowl hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Waterfowl PRCA

No significant attributes were identified in the PRCA regression for waterfowl hunters who currently reside in an urban city center, downtown, or suburb

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Waterfowl PRCA

 

PRCA for waterfowl hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Waterfowl PRCA

 

PRCA for waterfowl hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Upland Game PRCA

PRCA for upland game hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Resident Upland Game PRCA

 

PRCA for RESIDENT upland game hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Non-resident Upland Game PRCA

 

PRCA for NON-RESIDENT upland game hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Most Important Hunting Activity Upland Game PRCA

 

PRCA for upland game hunters who feel upland game hunting is their MOST IMPORTANT hunting activity. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Upland Game PRCA

 

No Reward estimate for Harvesting the Daily Bag Limit

PRCA for hunters who feel upland game hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL important hunting activities. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Upland Game PRCA

 

PRCA for upland game hunters residing in a Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Upland Game PRCA

 

No estimate for harvesting the daily bag limit

PRCA for upland game hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Upland Game PRCA

 

No estimate for harvesting the daily bag limit

PRCA for upland game hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Upland Game PRCA

 

PRCA for upland game hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Spring Turkey PRCA

PRCA for spring turkey hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Resident Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for RESIDENT spring turkey hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Non-resident Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for NON-RESIDENT spring turkey hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Most Important Hunting Activity Spring Turkey PRCA

 

There were no significant attributes for hunters who stated Spring Turkey Hunting was their most important hunting activity

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for hunters who feel turkey hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL important hunting activities. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for spring turkey hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, or RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for spring turkey hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for spring turkey hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Spring Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for spring turkey hunters who grew up in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Fall Turkey PRCA

PRCA for fall turkey hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Resident Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for RESIDENT fall turkey hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Non-resident Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for NON-RESIDENT fall turkey hunters. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Most Important Hunting Activity Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for hunters who feel turkey hunting is the MOST important hunting activity. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

One of Several Important Hunting Activities Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for hunters who feel turkey hunting is ONE OF SEVERAL important hunting activities. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for fall turkey hunters residing in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, or RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Current Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for fall turkey hunters residing in an URBAN CITY CENTER, DOWNTOWN OR SUBURB. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Rural Town, Village, Farm, or Ranch Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for fall turkey hunters who grew up in a RURAL TOWN, VILLAGE, FARM, OR RANCH. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Childhood Residence: Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb Fall Turkey PRCA

 

PRCA for fall turkey hunters who grew up in an Urban City Center, Downtown, or Suburb. Only attributes found significant in the linear regression were included in the PRCA.

Survey Section 4: Hunting Experience

Days Hunted on Typical Trip

About how many days did you spend hunting on a typical XXXX hunting trip in Nebraska in XXXX?

Mean number of RESIDENT days hunting on typical hunting trip. Bars represent number of days hunting their respective game type (i.e. Number of days deer hunters have hunted for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT days hunting on typical hunting trip. Bars represent number of days hunting their respective game type (i.e. Number of days deer hunters have hunted for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Number of Days Hunting on Typical Deer Hunting Trip

About how many days did you spend hunting on a typical Deer hunting trip in Nebraska in 2019?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of days hunting deer on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of days hunting deer on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Days Hunting on Typical Waterfowl Hunting Trip

About how many days did you spend hunting on a typical Waterfowl hunting trip in Nebraska in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of days hunting waterfowl on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of days hunting waterfowl on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Days Hunting on Typical Upland Game Hunting Trip

About how many days did you spend hunting on a typical Upland Game hunting trip in Nebraska in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of days hunting upland game on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of days hunting upland game on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Days Hunting on Typical Spring Turkey Hunting Trip

About how many days did you spend hunting on a typical Upland Game hunting trip in Nebraska in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of days hunting spring turkey on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of days hunting spring turkey on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Days Hunting on Typical Fall Turkey Hunting Trip

About how many days did you spend hunting on a typical Fall Turkey hunting trip in Nebraska in 2019?

Percentage of RESIDENT number of days hunting fall turkey on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of days hunting fall turkey on a typical hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Hours Actively Hunting on a Typical Hunting Trip

About how many hours did you spend actively hunting on a typical XXXX hunting trip in Nebraska in XXXX?

Percentage of hunter response for number of hours spent hunting on a typical hunting trip. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Hours Actively Hunting on Deer Trip

About how many hours did you spend actively hunting on a typical Deer hunting trip in Nebraska in 2018?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Less than 1 hour	0	0.0	6	1.1	6	0.9
1 - 3 hours	6	3.8	41	7.6	47	6.8
4 - 6 hours	16	10.2	127	23.6	143	20.6
7 - 11 hours	19	12.1	87	16.2	106	15.3
12 - 24 hours	21	13.4	69	12.8	90	12.9
24 - 48 hours	31	19.7	84	15.6	115	16.5
48 - 72 hours	30	19.1	53	9.9	83	11.9
More than 72 hours	34	21.7	59	11.0	93	13.4
No Response	0	0.0	12	2.2	12	1.7
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Hours Actively Hunting on Waterfowl Trip

About how many hours did you spend actively hunting on a typical Waterfowl hunting trip in Nebraska in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Less than 1 hour	0	0	2	0.5	2	0.5
1 - 3 hours	1	20	34	8.7	35	8.8
4 - 6 hours	2	40	198	50.5	200	50.4
7 - 11 hours	0	0	73	18.6	73	18.4
12 - 24 hours	2	40	37	9.4	39	9.8
24 - 48 hours	0	0	9	2.3	9	2.3
48 - 72 hours	0	0	8	2.0	8	2.0
More than 72 hours	0	0	20	5.1	20	5.0
No Response	0	0	11	2.8	11	2.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Hours Actively Hunting on Upland Game Trip

About how many hours did you spend actively hunting on a typical Upland Game hunting trip in Nebraska in the 2019-2020 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Less than 1 hour	0	0.0	7	4.0	7	2.5
1 - 3 hours	4	3.9	33	18.9	37	13.3
4 - 6 hours	31	30.1	79	45.1	110	39.6
7 - 11 hours	15	14.6	25	14.3	40	14.4
12 - 24 hours	28	27.2	11	6.3	39	14.0
24 - 48 hours	13	12.6	7	4.0	20	7.2
48 - 72 hours	5	4.9	5	2.9	10	3.6
More than 72 hours	6	5.8	4	2.3	10	3.6
No Response	1	1.0	4	2.3	5	1.8
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Hours Actively Hunting on Spring Turkey Trip

About how many hours did you spend actively hunting on a typical Spring Turkey hunting trip in Nebraska in 2020?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Less than 1 hour	1	1.6	5	1.0	6	1.0
1 - 3 hours	6	9.7	77	15.0	83	14.4
4 - 6 hours	13	21.0	196	38.2	209	36.3
7 - 11 hours	9	14.5	89	17.3	98	17.0
12 - 24 hours	10	16.1	60	11.7	70	12.2
24 - 48 hours	13	21.0	35	6.8	48	8.3
48 - 72 hours	6	9.7	19	3.7	25	4.3
More than 72 hours	3	4.8	27	5.3	30	5.2
No Response	1	1.6	5	1.0	6	1.0
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Hours Actively Hunting on Fall Turkey Trip

About how many hours did you spend actively hunting on a typical Fall Turkey hunting trip in Nebraska in 2019?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Less than 1 hour	0	0.0	8	2.3	8	1.8
1 - 3 hours	9	9.8	84	24.5	93	21.4
4 - 6 hours	30	32.6	124	36.2	154	35.4
7 - 11 hours	17	18.5	47	13.7	64	14.7
12 - 24 hours	21	22.8	41	12.0	62	14.3
24 - 48 hours	8	8.7	12	3.5	20	4.6
48 - 72 hours	1	1.1	6	1.7	7	1.6
More than 72 hours	6	6.5	10	2.9	16	3.7
No Response	0	0.0	11	3.2	11	2.5
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Miles Traveled

About how many miles did you travel, one way, from your home residence to your XXXX hunting destination in Nebraska in XXXX?

On a Typical Hunting Trip

Mean number of RESIDENT miles traveled on typical hunting trip. Bars represent number of miles typically traveled to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of miles deer hunters typically traveled to hunt for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT miles traveled on typical hunting trip. Bars represent number of miles typically traveled to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of miles deer hunters typically traveled to hunt for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Number of Miles Traveled on Typical Deer Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical deer hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical deer hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Typical Waterfowl Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical waterfowl hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical waterfowl hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Typical Upland Game Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical upland game hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical upland game hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Typical Spring Turkey Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical spring turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical spring turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Typical Fall Turkey Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical fall turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on a typical fall turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

On Your Furthest Hunting Trip

Mean number of RESIDENT miles traveled on furthest hunting trip. Bars represent number of miles traveled to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of miles deer hunters traveled to hunt for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT miles traveled on furthest hunting trip. Bars represent number of miles traveled to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of miles deer hunters traveled to hunt for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Number of Miles Traveled on Furthest Deer Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest deer hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest deer hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Furthest Waterfowl Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest waterfowl hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest waterfowl hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Furthest Upland Game Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest upland game hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest upland game hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Furthest Spring Turkey Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest spring turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest spring turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Miles Traveled on Furthest Fall Turkey Hunting Trip

 

Percentage of RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest fall turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of miles traveled on the furthest fall turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

County Hunted

Hunting County Deer

In which county did you hunt Deer most frequently in Nebraska in 2019?

Nebraska county in which Deer hunts most frequently occurred

Hunting County Waterfowl

In which county did you hunt Waterfowl most frequently in Nebraska in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Nebraska county in which Waterfowl hunts most frequently occurred

Hunting County Upland Game

In which county did you hunt Upland Game most frequently in Nebraska in the 2019 - 2020 season?

Nebraska county in which upland game hunts most frequently occurred

Hunting County Spring Turkey

In which county did you hunt Spring Turkey most frequently in Nebraska in 2020?

Nebraska county in which Turkey hunts most frequently occurred

Hunting County Fall Turkey

In which county did you hunt Fall Turkey most frequently in Nebraska in 2019?

Nebraska county in which Turkey hunts most frequently occurred

Number of Additional Hunters in Party

How many other hunters did you hunt with on a typical XXXX hunting trip in Nebraska in XXXX?

Mean number of RESIDENT additional hunters in party. Bars represent additional number of hunters while hunting their respective game type (i.e. Number of additional hunters in party when hunting for for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT additional hunters in party. Bars represent additional number of hunters while hunting their respective game type (i.e. Number of additional hunters in party when hunting for for deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Number of Additional Hunters on Deer Hunting Trip

Percentage of RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on deer hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on deer hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Additional Hunters on Waterfowl Hunting Trip

Percentage of RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on waterfowl hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on waterfowl hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Additional Hunters on Upland Game Hunting Trip

Percentage of RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on upland game hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on upland game hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Additional Hunters on Spring Turkey Hunting Trip

Percentage of RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on spring turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on spring turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Additional Hunters on Fall Turkey Hunting Trip

Percentage of RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on fall turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of additional hunters in party on fall turkey hunting trip. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Survey Section 5: Hunting Season

Number of Hunting Trips

How many XXXX hunting trips did you take in Nebraska in the XXXX season?

Mean number of RESIDENT hunting trips taken. Bars represent number of trips taken to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of deer-hunting trips deer hunters took to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT hunting trips taken. Bars represent number of trips taken to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of deer-hunting trips deer hunters took to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Number of Trips Taken by Deer Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT number of trips taken by deer hunters. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of trips taken by deer hunters. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Trips Taken by Waterfowl Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT number of trips taken by waterfowl hunters. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of trips taken by waterfowl hunters. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual response

Number of Trips Taken by Upland Game Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT number of trips taken by upland game hunters. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of trips taken by upland game hunters. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Trips Taken by Spring Turkey Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT number of trips taken by spring turkey hunters. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of trips taken by spring turkey hunters. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Number of Trips Taken by Fall Turkey Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT number of trips taken by fall turkey hunters. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT number of trips taken by fall turkey hunters. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars spent

Approximately how much did you spend on XXXX hunting expenses for each of the following categories in Nebraska in XXXX?

Lodging

Mean number of RESIDENT dollars spent on lodging. Bars represent number of dollars spent on lodging to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on lodging to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent on lodging. Bars represent number of dollars spent on lodging to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on lodging to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Dollars Spent on Lodging by Deer Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Lodging by Waterfowl Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Lodging by Upland Game Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Lodging by Spring Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Lodging by Fall Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on LODGING. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Hunting Equipment

Mean number of RESIDENT dollars spent on hunting equipment. Bars represent number of dollars spent on hunting equipment to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting equipment to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent on hunting equipment. Bars represent number of dollars spent on hunting equipment to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting equipment to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Dollars Spent on Hunting Equipment by Deer Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Equipment by Waterfowl Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Equipment by Upland Game Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Equipment by Spring Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Equipment by Fall Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on hunting equipment. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Hunting Lease(s)

Only respondents who claimed to hunt on leased land at least some of the time are included in the Hunting Leases(s) sub-section.

Mean number of RESIDENT dollars spent on hunting leases. Bars represent number of dollars spent on hunting leases to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting leases to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent on hunting leases. Bars represent number of dollars spent on hunting leases to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting leases to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Dollars Spent on Hunting Leases by Deer Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Leases by Waterfowl Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Leases by Upland Game Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Leases by Spring Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Hunting Leases by Fall Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on hunting leases. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Fuel

Mean number of RESIDENT dollars spent on fuel. Bars represent number of dollars spent on fuel to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on fuel to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Mean number of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent on fuel. Bars represent number of dollars spent on fuel to hunt their respective game type (i.e. Number of dollars spent by deer hunters on fuel to hunt deer). Error bars represent standard deviations.

Dollars Spent on Fuel by Deer Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by deer hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Deer Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Fuel by Waterfowl Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by waterfowl hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Waterfowl Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Fuel by Upland Game Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by upland game hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Upland Game Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Fuel by Spring Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by spring turkey hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Spring Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Dollars Spent on Fuel by Fall Turkey Hunters

 

Percentage of RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT dollars spent by fall turkey hunters on fuel. Bars represent responses from the Fall Turkey Survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses

Type of Land Hunted

About what percent (%) of your 20XX Nebraska XXXX hunting trips occurred on each of the following land types?

Private Land Owned by Self, Friend, or Family

Percentage of hunter response for percent of time spent hunting on PRIVATE LAND. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Private Land Hunting by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	53	33.8	46	8.6	99	14.2
25%	6	3.8	18	3.3	24	3.5
50%	11	7.0	24	4.5	35	5.0
75%	11	7.0	56	10.4	67	9.6
100%	67	42.7	387	71.9	454	65.3
No Response	9	5.7	7	1.3	16	2.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Private Land Hunting by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	2	40	85	21.7	87	21.9
25%	0	0	49	12.5	49	12.3
50%	1	20	31	7.9	32	8.1
75%	0	0	67	17.1	67	16.9
100%	2	40	149	38.0	151	38.0
No Response	0	0	11	2.8	11	2.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Private Land Hunting by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	36	35.0	28	16.0	64	23.0
25%	9	8.7	25	14.3	34	12.2
50%	8	7.8	21	12.0	29	10.4
75%	13	12.6	38	21.7	51	18.3
100%	26	25.2	54	30.9	80	28.8
No Response	11	10.7	9	5.1	20	7.2
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Private Land Hunting by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	17	27.4	69	13.5	86	15.0
25%	3	4.8	35	6.8	38	6.6
50%	2	3.2	42	8.2	44	7.7
75%	8	12.9	66	12.9	74	12.9
100%	26	41.9	289	56.3	315	54.8
No Response	6	9.7	12	2.3	18	3.1
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Private Land Hunting by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	22	23.9	68	19.8	90	20.7
25%	5	5.4	10	2.9	15	3.4
50%	2	2.2	16	4.7	18	4.1
75%	10	10.9	61	17.8	71	16.3
100%	49	53.3	178	51.9	227	52.2
No Response	4	4.3	10	2.9	14	3.2
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Hunting Lease

Percentage of hunter response for percent of time spent hunting on LEASED LAND. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Leased Land Hunting by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	98	62.4	425	79.0	523	75.3
25%	0	0.0	9	1.7	9	1.3
50%	8	5.1	5	0.9	13	1.9
75%	4	2.5	5	0.9	9	1.3
100%	29	18.5	13	2.4	42	6.0
No Response	18	11.5	81	15.1	99	14.2
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Leased Land Hunting by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	3	60	244	62.2	247	62.2
25%	0	0	21	5.4	21	5.3
50%	0	0	16	4.1	16	4.0
75%	0	0	28	7.1	28	7.1
100%	2	40	35	8.9	37	9.3
No Response	0	0	48	12.2	48	12.1
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Leased Land Hunting by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	64	62.1	133	76.0	197	70.9
25%	4	3.9	4	2.3	8	2.9
50%	3	2.9	2	1.1	5	1.8
75%	1	1.0	3	1.7	4	1.4
100%	6	5.8	5	2.9	11	4.0
No Response	25	24.3	28	16.0	53	19.1
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Leased Land Hunting by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	40	64.5	413	80.5	453	78.8
25%	2	3.2	5	1.0	7	1.2
50%	2	3.2	4	0.8	6	1.0
75%	2	3.2	8	1.6	10	1.7
100%	10	16.1	16	3.1	26	4.5
No Response	6	9.7	67	13.1	73	12.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Leased Land Hunting by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	65	70.7	273	79.6	338	77.7
25%	1	1.1	5	1.5	6	1.4
50%	3	3.3	1	0.3	4	0.9
75%	1	1.1	6	1.7	7	1.6
100%	11	12.0	16	4.7	27	6.2
No Response	11	12.0	42	12.2	53	12.2
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Open Fields and Waters Land

Percentage of hunter response for percent of time spent hunting on OFW LAND. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

OFW Land Hunting by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	98	62.4	383	71.2	481	69.2
25%	11	7.0	28	5.2	39	5.6
50%	8	5.1	20	3.7	28	4.0
75%	2	1.3	6	1.1	8	1.2
100%	8	5.1	10	1.9	18	2.6
No Response	30	19.1	91	16.9	121	17.4
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

OFW Land Hunting by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	5	100	228	58.2	233	58.7
25%	0	0	56	14.3	56	14.1
50%	0	0	20	5.1	20	5.0
75%	0	0	9	2.3	9	2.3
100%	0	0	28	7.1	28	7.1
No Response	0	0	51	13.0	51	12.8
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

OFW Land Hunting by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	45	43.7	80	45.7	125	45.0
25%	15	14.6	40	22.9	55	19.8
50%	11	10.7	16	9.1	27	9.7
75%	7	6.8	4	2.3	11	4.0
100%	7	6.8	7	4.0	14	5.0
No Response	18	17.5	28	16.0	46	16.5
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

OFW Land Hunting by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	45	72.6	361	70.4	406	70.6
25%	2	3.2	54	10.5	56	9.7
50%	2	3.2	18	3.5	20	3.5
75%	0	0.0	5	1.0	5	0.9
100%	1	1.6	9	1.8	10	1.7
No Response	12	19.4	66	12.9	78	13.6
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

OFW Land Hunting by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	64	69.6	228	66.5	292	67.1
25%	6	6.5	36	10.5	42	9.7
50%	3	3.3	20	5.8	23	5.3
75%	4	4.3	9	2.6	13	3.0
100%	2	2.2	6	1.7	8	1.8
No Response	13	14.1	44	12.8	57	13.1
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Public Land

Percentage of hunter response for percent of time spent hunting on PUBLIC LAND. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Public Land Hunting by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	78	49.7	331	61.5	409	58.8
25%	16	10.2	72	13.4	88	12.7
50%	13	8.3	23	4.3	36	5.2
75%	4	2.5	17	3.2	21	3.0
100%	25	15.9	26	4.8	51	7.3
No Response	21	13.4	69	12.8	90	12.9
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Public Land Hunting by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	3	60	176	44.9	179	45.1
25%	1	20	80	20.4	81	20.4
50%	1	20	31	7.9	32	8.1
75%	0	0	30	7.7	30	7.6
100%	0	0	38	9.7	38	9.6
No Response	0	0	37	9.4	37	9.3
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Public Land Hunting by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	33	32.0	48	27.4	81	29.1
25%	18	17.5	48	27.4	66	23.7
50%	14	13.6	25	14.3	39	14.0
75%	9	8.7	18	10.3	27	9.7
100%	17	16.5	19	10.9	36	12.9
No Response	12	11.7	17	9.7	29	10.4
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Public Land Hunting by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	33	53.2	284	55.4	317	55.1
25%	7	11.3	69	13.5	76	13.2
50%	3	4.8	38	7.4	41	7.1
75%	1	1.6	31	6.0	32	5.6
100%	11	17.7	48	9.4	59	10.3
No Response	7	11.3	43	8.4	50	8.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Public Land Hunting by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
0%	52	56.5	181	52.8	233	53.6
25%	9	9.8	63	18.4	72	16.6
50%	2	2.2	19	5.5	21	4.8
75%	3	3.3	14	4.1	17	3.9
100%	12	13.0	32	9.3	44	10.1
No Response	14	15.2	34	9.9	48	11.0
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvest

Did you successfully harvest XXXX during the XXXX season?

Percentage of successful harvest in the previous season for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Hunter Harvest Success

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	110	70.1	294	54.6	404	58.1
No	46	29.3	236	43.9	282	40.6
No Response	1	0.6	8	1.5	9	1.3
Total	157	100.0	538	100.0	695	100.0

Waterfowl Hunter Harvest Success

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	3	60	345	88.0	348	87.7
No	2	40	37	9.4	39	9.8
No Response	0	0	10	2.6	10	2.5
Total	5	100	392	100.0	397	100.0

Upland Game Hunter Harvest Success

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	82	79.6	113	64.6	195	70.1
No	20	19.4	54	30.9	74	26.6
No Response	1	1.0	8	4.6	9	3.2
Total	103	100.0	175	100.0	278	100.0

Spring Turkey Hunter Harvest Success

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	46	74.2	266	51.9	312	54.3
No	14	22.6	234	45.6	248	43.1
No Response	2	3.2	13	2.5	15	2.6
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Fall Turkey Hunter Harvest Success

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	51	55.4	144	42.0	195	44.8
No	41	44.6	188	54.8	229	52.6
No Response	0	0.0	11	3.2	11	2.5
Total	92	100.0	343	100.0	435	100.0

Harvest Bag Limit

Waterfowl Bag Limit

Did you harvest your daily bag limit of Waterfowl at least once during the 2019 - 2020 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	3	100	192	55.7	195	56.0
No	0	0	152	44.1	152	43.7
No Response	0	0	1	0.3	1	0.3
Total	3	100	345	100.0	348	100.0

Upland Game Bag Limit

Did you harvest your daily bag limit of Upland Game birds at least once during the 2019 - 2020 season?

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	38	46.3	37	32.7	75	38.5
No	44	53.7	75	66.4	119	61.0
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.9	1	0.5
Total	82	100.0	113	100.0	195	100.0

Survey Section 6: Demographics

Residency

Are you a Nebraska resident?

Percentage of residency status for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Past Residency

Were you ever a Nebraska resident in the past? Only includes respondents who answered as a non-resident in the previous question

Percentage of non-residents that were ever a Nebraska resident for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Sex

What is your sex?

Percentage of respondent sex for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Birth Year

Birth year converted to age

Mean respondent age of RESIDENTS for each satisfaction survey. Error bars represent standard deviation.

Mean respondent age of NON-RESIDENTS for each satisfaction survey. Error bars represent standard deviation.

Age of Deer Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT deer hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT deer hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Age of Waterfowl Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT waterfowl hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT waterfowl hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Age of Upland Game Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT upland game hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT upland game hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Age of Spring Turkey Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT spring turkey hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT spring turkey hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Age of Fall Turkey Hunters

Percentage of RESIDENT fall turkey hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Percentage of NON-RESIDENT fall turkey hunter age. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Home Residence

Which best describes the neighborhood of your home residence?

Percentage of hunter response for neighborhood description. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Neighborhood Description by Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	6	3.7	11	2.0	17	2.4
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	48	29.4	198	36.1	246	34.6
Rural Town or Village	63	38.7	217	39.6	280	39.4
Rural Farm/Ranch	44	27.0	121	22.1	165	23.2
No Response	2	1.2	1	0.2	3	0.4
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Neighborhood Description by Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	0	0.0	11	2.2	11	2.2
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	5	71.4	191	38.3	196	38.7
Rural Town or Village	1	14.3	196	39.3	197	38.9
Rural Farm/Ranch	1	14.3	97	19.4	98	19.4
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.8	4	0.8
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Neighborhood Description by Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	3	2.8	3	1.6	6	2.1
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	58	53.7	85	46.2	143	49.0
Rural Town or Village	30	27.8	58	31.5	88	30.1
Rural Farm/Ranch	15	13.9	37	20.1	52	17.8
No Response	2	1.9	1	0.5	3	1.0
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Neighborhood Description by Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	0	0.0	14	2.7	14	2.4
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	25	40.3	220	42.9	245	42.6
Rural Town or Village	24	38.7	186	36.3	210	36.5
Rural Farm/Ranch	13	21.0	91	17.7	104	18.1
No Response	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.3
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Neighborhood Description by Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	4	4.3	11	3.3	15	3.5
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	43	46.7	145	43.2	188	43.9
Rural Town or Village	25	27.2	103	30.7	128	29.9
Rural Farm/Ranch	20	21.7	72	21.4	92	21.5
No Response	0	0.0	5	1.5	5	1.2
Total	92	100.0	336	100.0	428	100.0

Childhood Residence

Which best describes the neighborhood of your home residence during childhood?

Percentage of hunter response for childhood residence. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Childhood Residence of Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	3	1.8	13	2.4	16	2.3
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	45	27.6	129	23.5	174	24.5
Rural Town or Village	70	42.9	217	39.6	287	40.4
Rural Farm/Ranch	44	27.0	187	34.1	231	32.5
No Response	1	0.6	2	0.4	3	0.4
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Childhood Residence of Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	0	0.0	14	2.8	14	2.8
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	2	28.6	125	25.1	127	25.1
Rural Town or Village	5	71.4	201	40.3	206	40.7
Rural Farm/Ranch	0	0.0	155	31.1	155	30.6
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.8	4	0.8
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Childhood Residence of Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	4	3.7	5	2.7	9	3.1
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	47	43.5	56	30.4	103	35.3
Rural Town or Village	32	29.6	75	40.8	107	36.6
Rural Farm/Ranch	23	21.3	45	24.5	68	23.3
No Response	2	1.9	3	1.6	5	1.7
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Childhood Residence of Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	1	1.6	16	3.1	17	3.0
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	21	33.9	155	30.2	176	30.6
Rural Town or Village	27	43.5	200	39.0	227	39.5
Rural Farm/Ranch	11	17.7	137	26.7	148	25.7
No Response	2	3.2	5	1.0	7	1.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Childhood Residence of Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Urban City Center/Downtown	6	6.5	14	4.2	20	4.7
Urban City Suburbs/Neighborhoods	40	43.5	109	32.4	149	34.8
Rural Town or Village	29	31.5	136	40.5	165	38.6
Rural Farm/Ranch	17	18.5	74	22.0	91	21.3
No Response	0	0.0	3	0.9	3	0.7
Total	92	100.0	336	100.0	428	100.0

Number of Children

How many children under the age of 16 reside in your household?

Percentage of hunter response for number of children in household. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Number of Children in Households of Deer Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
None	124	76.1	331	60.4	455	64.0
1	13	8.0	69	12.6	82	11.5
2	18	11.0	95	17.3	113	15.9
3	3	1.8	32	5.8	35	4.9
4	2	1.2	12	2.2	14	2.0
5	1	0.6	0	0.0	1	0.1
7 +	1	0.6	1	0.2	2	0.3
No Response	1	0.6	8	1.5	9	1.3
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Number of Children in Households of Waterfowl Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
None	5	71.4	320	64.1	325	64.2
1	1	14.3	58	11.6	59	11.7
2	0	0.0	80	16.0	80	15.8
3	0	0.0	26	5.2	26	5.1
4	0	0.0	6	1.2	6	1.2
5	1	14.3	2	0.4	3	0.6
No Response	0	0.0	7	1.4	7	1.4
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Number of Children in Households of Upland Game Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
None	88	81.5	121	65.8	209	71.6
1	10	9.3	26	14.1	36	12.3
2	5	4.6	20	10.9	25	8.6
3	4	3.7	7	3.8	11	3.8
4	0	0.0	3	1.6	3	1.0
5	0	0.0	2	1.1	2	0.7
6	0	0.0	1	0.5	1	0.3
No Response	1	0.9	4	2.2	5	1.7
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Number of Children in Households of Spring Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
None	45	72.6	317	61.8	362	63.0
1	4	6.5	65	12.7	69	12.0
2	9	14.5	79	15.4	88	15.3
3	1	1.6	35	6.8	36	6.3
4	1	1.6	12	2.3	13	2.3
5	0	0.0	1	0.2	1	0.2
No Response	2	3.2	4	0.8	6	1.0
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Number of Children in Households of Fall Turkey Hunters

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
None	69	75.0	236	70.2	305	71.3
1	9	9.8	34	10.1	43	10.0
2	11	12.0	43	12.8	54	12.6
3	1	1.1	16	4.8	17	4.0
4	1	1.1	4	1.2	5	1.2
No Response	1	1.1	3	0.9	4	0.9
Total	92	100.0	336	100.0	428	100.0

Education

What is your highest level of education?

Percentage of hunter response for highest level of education. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Hunter Education

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Some High School	2	1.2	6	1.1	8	1.1
High School Graduate	22	13.5	66	12.0	88	12.4
Some Technical School	9	5.5	32	5.8	41	5.8
Some College	23	14.1	88	16.1	111	15.6
Technical Degree/Certification	15	9.2	76	13.9	91	12.8
College Degree	49	30.1	165	30.1	214	30.1
Some Graduate School	10	6.1	20	3.6	30	4.2
Graduate School Degree (Masters Degree)	20	12.3	57	10.4	77	10.8
Professional Degree (Ph.D., M.D., J.D., E.D.D., D.O.D., etc.)	10	6.1	30	5.5	40	5.6
No Response	3	1.8	8	1.5	11	1.5
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Waterfowl Hunter Education

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Some High School	0	0.0	2	0.4	2	0.4
High School Graduate	0	0.0	62	12.4	62	12.3
Some Technical School	0	0.0	16	3.2	16	3.2
Some College	0	0.0	74	14.8	74	14.6
Technical Degree/Certification	0	0.0	59	11.8	59	11.7
College Degree	5	71.4	180	36.1	185	36.6
Some Graduate School	1	14.3	24	4.8	25	4.9
Graduate School Degree (Masters Degree)	1	14.3	44	8.8	45	8.9
Professional Degree (Ph.D., M.D., J.D., E.D.D., D.O.D., etc.)	0	0.0	32	6.4	32	6.3
No Response	0	0.0	6	1.2	6	1.2
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Upland Game Hunter Education

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Some High School	0	0.0	1	0.5	1	0.3
High School Graduate	4	3.7	16	8.7	20	6.8
Some Technical School	1	0.9	7	3.8	8	2.7
Some College	20	18.5	38	20.7	58	19.9
Technical Degree/Certification	8	7.4	20	10.9	28	9.6
College Degree	39	36.1	60	32.6	99	33.9
Some Graduate School	6	5.6	6	3.3	12	4.1
Graduate School Degree (Masters Degree)	20	18.5	23	12.5	43	14.7
Professional Degree (Ph.D., M.D., J.D., E.D.D., D.O.D., etc.)	8	7.4	11	6.0	19	6.5
No Response	2	1.9	2	1.1	4	1.4
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Spring Turkey Hunter Education

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Some High School	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.5
High School Graduate	8	12.9	44	8.6	52	9.0
Some Technical School	1	1.6	18	3.5	19	3.3
Some College	12	19.4	72	14.0	84	14.6
Technical Degree/Certification	4	6.5	64	12.5	68	11.8
College Degree	23	37.1	188	36.6	211	36.7
Some Graduate School	2	3.2	19	3.7	21	3.7
Graduate School Degree (Masters Degree)	5	8.1	68	13.3	73	12.7
Professional Degree (Ph.D., M.D., J.D., E.D.D., D.O.D., etc.)	3	4.8	34	6.6	37	6.4
No Response	4	6.5	3	0.6	7	1.2
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Fall Turkey Hunter Education

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Some High School	0	0.0	3	0.9	3	0.7
High School Graduate	12	13.0	34	10.1	46	10.7
Some Technical School	1	1.1	12	3.6	13	3.0
Some College	15	16.3	50	14.9	65	15.2
Technical Degree/Certification	3	3.3	34	10.1	37	8.6
College Degree	30	32.6	108	32.1	138	32.2
Some Graduate School	7	7.6	20	6.0	27	6.3
Graduate School Degree (Masters Degree)	15	16.3	47	14.0	62	14.5
Professional Degree (Ph.D., M.D., J.D., E.D.D., D.O.D., etc.)	7	7.6	24	7.1	31	7.2
No Response	2	2.2	4	1.2	6	1.4
Total	92	100.0	336	100.0	428	100.0

Income

What is the total combined annual income, before taxes, of all household members, including yourself?

Percentage of hunter response for level of income. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Hunter Income

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Under $30,000	2	1.2	22	4.0	24	3.4
$30,000- $49,999	12	7.4	59	10.8	71	10.0
$50,000- $99,999	40	24.5	192	35.0	232	32.6
$100,000- $149,999	55	33.7	115	21.0	170	23.9
$150,000- $199,999	21	12.9	56	10.2	77	10.8
$200,000- $249,999	7	4.3	21	3.8	28	3.9
$250,000 or more	16	9.8	31	5.7	47	6.6
No Response	10	6.1	52	9.5	62	8.7
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Waterfowl Hunter Income

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Under $30,000	0	0.0	21	4.2	21	4.2
$30,000- $49,999	1	14.3	41	8.2	42	8.3
$50,000- $99,999	2	28.6	162	32.5	164	32.4
$100,000- $149,999	1	14.3	128	25.7	129	25.5
$150,000- $199,999	2	28.6	56	11.2	58	11.5
$200,000- $249,999	1	14.3	24	4.8	25	4.9
$250,000 or more	0	0.0	22	4.4	22	4.3
No Response	0	0.0	45	9.0	45	8.9
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Upland Game Hunter Income

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Under $30,000	2	1.9	9	4.9	11	3.8
$30,000- $49,999	4	3.7	11	6.0	15	5.1
$50,000- $99,999	18	16.7	68	37.0	86	29.5
$100,000- $149,999	30	27.8	56	30.4	86	29.5
$150,000- $199,999	17	15.7	19	10.3	36	12.3
$200,000- $249,999	6	5.6	2	1.1	8	2.7
$250,000 or more	14	13.0	4	2.2	18	6.2
No Response	17	15.7	15	8.2	32	11.0
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Spring Turkey Hunter Income

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Under $30,000	4	6.5	15	2.9	19	3.3
$30,000- $49,999	2	3.2	41	8.0	43	7.5
$50,000- $99,999	12	19.4	152	29.6	164	28.5
$100,000- $149,999	17	27.4	137	26.7	154	26.8
$150,000- $199,999	6	9.7	61	11.9	67	11.7
$200,000- $249,999	5	8.1	24	4.7	29	5.0
$250,000 or more	9	14.5	40	7.8	49	8.5
No Response	7	11.3	43	8.4	50	8.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Fall Turkey Hunter Income

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Under $30,000	2	2.2	10	3.0	12	2.8
$30,000- $49,999	6	6.5	22	6.5	28	6.5
$50,000- $99,999	22	23.9	110	32.7	132	30.8
$100,000- $149,999	21	22.8	90	26.8	111	25.9
$150,000- $199,999	11	12.0	30	8.9	41	9.6
$200,000- $249,999	11	12.0	18	5.4	29	6.8
$250,000 or more	11	12.0	21	6.2	32	7.5
No Response	8	8.7	35	10.4	43	10.0
Total	92	100.0	336	100.0	428	100.0

Willingness for Future Participation

Would you be willing to participate in this survey again next season?

Percentage of hunter response for willingness to participate in 2020 survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Deer Hunter Willingness to Participate in 2021 Survey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	146	89.6	481	87.8	627	88.2
No	16	9.8	66	12.0	82	11.5
No Response	1	0.6	1	0.2	2	0.3
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Waterfowl Hunter Willingness to Participate in 2021 Survey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	5	71.4	436	87.4	441	87.2
No	2	28.6	60	12.0	62	12.3
No Response	0	0.0	3	0.6	3	0.6
Total	7	100.0	499	100.0	506	100.0

Upland Game Hunter Willingness to Participate in 2021 Survey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	97	89.8	158	85.9	255	87.3
No	11	10.2	25	13.6	36	12.3
No Response	0	0.0	1	0.5	1	0.3
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Spring Turkey Hunter Willingness to Participate in 2021 Survey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	57	91.9	467	91.0	524	91.1
No	5	8.1	42	8.2	47	8.2
No Response	0	0.0	4	0.8	4	0.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Fall Turkey Hunter Willingness to Participate in 2021 Survey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	82	89.1	309	92	391	91.4
No	9	9.8	27	8	36	8.4
No Response	1	1.1	0	0	1	0.2
Total	92	100.0	336	100	428	100.0

Youth Pheasant Hunting Events

Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation

Have you ever participated in one of the special youth pheasant hunts during the youth pheasant, quail, and partridge season, where pheasants were released at several Wildlife Management Areas?

Percentage of hunters who participated in a special youth hunt for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation Deer

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	2	1.2	48	8.8	50	7.0
No	159	97.5	498	90.9	657	92.4
No Response	2	1.2	2	0.4	4	0.6
Total	163	100.0	548	100.0	711	100.0

Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation Waterfowl

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	0	0	68	13.6	68	13.4
No	7	100	429	86.0	436	86.2
No Response	0	0	2	0.4	2	0.4
Total	7	100	499	100.0	506	100.0

Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation Upland Game

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	3	2.8	18	9.8	21	7.2
No	105	97.2	166	90.2	271	92.8
Total	108	100.0	184	100.0	292	100.0

Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation Spring Turkey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	0	0.0	64	12.5	64	11.1
No	61	98.4	446	86.9	507	88.2
No Response	1	1.6	3	0.6	4	0.7
Total	62	100.0	513	100.0	575	100.0

Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation Fall Turkey

Response	Non-residents (N)	Non-residents (%)	Residents (N)	Residents (%)	Both Residencies (N)	Both Residencies (%)
Yes	0	0.0	35	10.4	35	8.2
No	90	97.8	297	88.4	387	90.4
No Response	2	2.2	4	1.2	6	1.4
Total	92	100.0	336	100.0	428	100.0

Type of Youth Pheasant Hunt Participation

In which of the following ways have you participated in the special youth pheasant hunts in the past? (select all that apply)

Percentage of hunters who participated as a mentor, youth hunter, or other in past special youth hunts for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

Year(s) in which Hunters Participated in Past Special Youth Pheasant Hunting Events

In which of the special youth pheasant hunts have you participated? (select all that apply)

Year(s) in which hunters participated in past special youth hunts for each satisfaction survey. Values above bars represent number of individual responses.

References

Brunke, K. D., and K. M. Hunt. 2007. Comparison of two approaches for the measurement of waterfowl hunter satisfaction. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12:443–457.

Callegaro, M., K. L. Manfreda, and V. Vehovar. 2015. Nonresponse strategy. Pages 130–159 in. Web survey methodology. Research methods for social scientists, Sage, London.

Deng, W. 2007. Using a revised importance–performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism. Tourism Management 28:1274–1284.

Deng, W.-J., Y.-F. Kuo, and W.-C. Chen. 2008. Revised importance–performance analysis: Three-factor theory and benchmarking. The Service Industries Journal 28:37–51.

Frey, S., M. Conover, J. Borgo, and T. Messmer. 2003. Factors influencing pheasant hunter harvest and satisfaction. Human dimensions of wildlife 8:277–286.

Gigliotti, L. M. 2000. A classification scheme to better understand satisfaction of Black Hills deer hunters: The role of harvest success. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5:32–51.

Hammitt, W. E., C. D. McDonald, and M. E. Patterson. 1990. Determinants of multiple satisfaction for deer hunting. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006) 18:331–337.

Hautaluoma, J., and P. J. Brown. 1978. Attributes of the deer hunting experience: A cluster-analytic study. Journal of Leisure Research 10:271.

Hayslette, S. E., J. B. Armstrong, and R. E. Mirarchi. 2001. Mourning dove hunting in Alabama: Motivations, satisfactions, and sociocultural influences. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6:81–95.

Hazel, K. L., E. E. Langenau Jr, and R. L. Levine. 1990. Dimensions of hunting satisfaction: Multiple-satisfactions of wild turkey hunting. Leisure Sciences 12:383–393.

Kerr, G. N. 2017. Big game hunting satisfaction: A test of diminishing marginal satisfaction of harvest. Lincoln University Research Center, New Zealand.

Kim, N., Y.-J. Ahn, and B. E. Wicks. 2014. Local festival quality and the application of a revised importance–performance analysis: The case of the Jirisan Cheon-Wang Festival. Event Management 18:89–100.

Manfredo, M. J., P. J. Fix, T. L. Teel, J. Smeltzer, and R. Kahn. 2004. Assessing demand for big-game hunting opportunities: Applying the multiple-satisfaction concept. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:1147–1155.

Matzler, K., and E. Sauerwein. 2002. The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty-reward-contrast analysis. International journal of service industry management 13:314–332.

Matzler, K., E. Sauerwein, and K. Heischmidt. 2003. Importance-performance analysis revisited: The role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. The Service Industries Journal 23:112–129.

Mikulić, J., and D. Prebežac. 2011. Rethinking the importance grid as a research tool for quality managers. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 22:993–1006.

Pang, A. 2017. Incorporating the effect of successfully bagging big game into recreational hunting: An examination of deer, moose and elk hunting. Journal of Forest Economics 28:12–17.

Schroeder, S. A., L. Cornicelli, D. C. Fulton, and S. S. Merchant. 2018. Explicit versus implicit motivations: Clarifying how experiences affect turkey hunter satisfaction using revised importance-performance, importance grid, and penalty-reward-contrast analyses. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 23:1–20.

Smith, R., and B. Deppa. 2009. Two dimensions of attribute importance. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26:28–38.

Vaske, J. J., A. J. Fedler, and A. R. Graefe. 1986. Multiple determinants of satisfaction from a specific waterfowl hunting trip. Leisure Sciences 8:149–166.

Vavra, T. G. 1997. Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction: A guide to creating, conducting, analyzing, and reporting customer satisfaction measurement programs. ASQ quality press.

Wynveen, C. J., D. A. Cavin, B. A. Wright, and W. E. Hammitt. 2005. Determinants of a quality wild turkey hunting season. Environmental management 36:117–124.